Fueling   "textbooks describe cellular and molecular synthesis and resynthesis have generally stated that 98% of what we are today (in terms of bone, muscle, and fat cell tissues) was constructed from the foods that we ate over the past 6-month time period."

Nutrition

Nancy Clark M.S. R.N.
Originally found on the Running Network

 

"I Know What I Should Do To Eat Well; I Just Don't Do It" If this mantra sounds familiar, the following primer can perhaps help you fuel yourself with premium nutrition and invest in your good health for many years to come.

Aging is the accumulation of a lifetime of poor nutrition and inactivity. To maintain your youthfulness, eat wisely, eat well, and enjoy regular physical activity. People who burn 1,500 calories per week via exercise tend to be healthier and live longer. Breakfast is the most important meal of the day. People who eat breakfast tend to make wiser food choices the rest of the day and have an overall healthier diet than do breakfast skippers. Cereal at 8:00 a.m. is nutritionally preferable to donuts at 10. Cereal is a breakfast of champions. Fiber-rich cereals (bran flakes, oat bran, all-bran, etc.) are among the best choices. Enjoy with a banana, low fat milk and glass of orange juice for an A+ meal that's high in carbohydrates, low in fat, calcium-rich and cook-free. Diets to lose weight should start dinner. Be sure to eat a substantial breakfast and lunch so you'll have the energy you need to exercise--and enjoy doing so, and remind yourself at dinner, "I'd rather be thinner than over-eat." Eat before you get too hungry! Otherwise, you'll start to crave sweets and will likely succumb to poor food choices. Fats are fattening in excess, but so are fat-free foods. Small amounts of fat can help balance your diet, satisfy your hunger and reduce the desire to eat yet-another-serving of fat-free food (frozen yogurt, cookies, etc.) that adds calories to your diet.

Good nutrition starts in the supermarket. Post a shopping list in a convenient place where you and your family can easily add to it, and then remember to use it! Shop when you are well fed. Otherwise, too many treats may jump into the shopping cart.

Hunger is simply your body's request for fuel. Honor your body's hunger by fueling yourself appropriately. Try to eat like a child--that is, eat when you are hungry, and stop when content. You'll achieve an appropriate weight and have lots of energy. Ice cream that is expensive tends to be highest in calories and fat. Stick to the inexpensive brands--or frozen yogurt. Junk food can fit into your diet after you have eaten wholesome meals. That is, you can appropriately enjoy a small brownie for dessert after a healthful lunch. Ten percent of your daily calories (about 180-250) can appropriately come from sugar.

Keep to an eating schedule. People tend to get hungry every four hours (breakfast at 8:00, lunch at 12:00, snack at 4:00, dinner at 7:00-8:00). Don't skip meals or you'll lack energy and likely over-compensate later in the day. Lentils, kidney beans, split pea soup and other foods made with beans and legumes are excellent for both protein and carbohydrates. They digest slowly, providing a steady release of energy that can enhance your stamina. Meats have a cholesterol content similar to chicken and fish. Meat's saturated fat is the health culprit. Two to four lean meat-meals per week can be a healthful addition to a sports diet, to provide protein as well as iron and zinc. No one should eliminate favorite foods, even foods loaded with fat. Denial will eventually lead to binge eating. For example, enjoying a "diet portion" of five chips every day is healthier than succumbing to 500 chips on the weekend.

Oranges, grapefruits and other citrus fruits are among the best fruit choices. They are rich in Vitamin C and potassium. Eat a citrus fruit daily--an excellent health-booster. A 6-ounce glass of orange juice provides the Daily Value for Vitamin C (60 mg).

Potatoes offer more nutritional value than do rice or pasta (plain, without the tomato sauce). Bake several and enjoy the planned-overs for breakfast, lunch and even snacks. Be sure to eat the skin--most of the vitamin C is right underneath! Quick Meals that include at least three types of wholesome foods tend to be "well-balanced" meals. Examples: cereal, milk and banana; bagel, peanut butter and yogurt; apple, low fat cheese and crackers; spaghetti, tomato sauce and ground turkey. Rather than suffer through fat-free cheese and other fat-free products that do not dazzle your taste buds, enjoy small portions of the "real thing." Given that 20-30 percent of your calories can appropriately come from fat, you might as well budget them in! Supplements are to supplement healthy eating, not to compensate for poor eating habits. For example, don't think that a calcium pill can replace milk, yogurt or other calcium-rich foods in your diet. Tofu (soy bean curd) is a health-protective food that reduces cholesterol and the risk of both heart disease and cancer. Add some to soups, casseroles and mixed meals. Tofu is sold in the produce section of the grocery store. Unless you want to become frail and lose your ability to live independently, you should do exercise that maintains your muscles. Muscles boost your metabolism, making it easier to eat more or lose weight. Strength training is the wave of the future! Vegetables are the best source of "all natural" vitamins. Colorful veggies such as broccoli, spinach, kale, carrots, sweet potatoes, peppers and tomatoes are powerhouses. The deeper and darker the color, the richer the nutritional value. Water is found not only in water, but also in oranges, soups, yogurt, salads and other watery foods. You are getting enough water if your urine is clear and voluminous, and if you urinate every two to four hours. Dark, smelly urine signifies dehydration. Extra vitamin E may be protective against heart disease and cancer. Because people cannot easily eat enough E via common food choices, a supplement of 200 to 400 IUs per day may be a wise health investment. Yes, you can take time to eat well. Avoid the trap, "I'm too busy and food is fattening, anyway." Food is one of life's pleasures. Zip and zing are the benefits of healthy eating. Eat well and enjoy your high energy, good health and top performances.

Nancy Clark, M.S., R.D., is the nutrition counselor at SportsMedicine Brookline. Her popular books "Nancy Clark's Sports Nutrition Guidebook" ($18), and "The New York City Marathon Cookbook" ($23), are filled with "how to" tips and are available by writing to: Sports Nutrition Services 830 Boylston St. #205 Brookline, MA 02167

 


George Beinhorn

 

"Ken Young raised some interesting points in the Jan/Feb issue of Ultra Running magazine ( page 44 ). I'd like to add to that discussion...

 

Just a thought. After going on a Pritkin-style ultra-low-fat diet a couple years ago and losing 40 lbs, I got into trouble. Began having mysterious immune ailments in the middle of summer (sinusitis, bronchitis). Started taking some fats and my energy and immunity "immediately" returned.

My main point, however, is that before going back to fats I did some reading which I found very interesting. Specifically, I read two books, "Fats that Heal, Fats that Kill" by Udo Erasmus, Ph.D. and "The Facts About Fats" by John Finnegan.

Both of these books report a great deal of research that isn't cited much elsewhere. For example, they quote numerous studies showing that the way fats are processed and cooked can be more injurious to health than the fats themselves. Hydrogenated fats are the worst.

My own experience confirms this. Some fats leave me feeling wasted--e.g., high-fat, high-processed "convenience foods" like fatty chips, etc. Others have a very detrimental effect on my ability to process oxygen, e.g. olive oil which is a high-monounsaturated fat source. Mono-unsaturated fats are known to clog small blood vessels, preventing oxygen from getting through.

So, there are different fats that may have very different effects on performance. My feeling about it is "as close to nature as possible, and avoid the monounsaturates while racing and the day before."

 


Karl King

I'd like to add to what Rich said. You can get way too paranoid about what to eat and percentages of carbo, fat and protein.

One of the fundamental principles of control system theory is that a system must be observable and controllable. The percentage of carbo, fat and protein that one eats is not observable in real time, so you can't really control the precise nature of your food intake.

As one nutritionist put it, all you need know about diet can be written on a 3 X 5 card. In general, cut back on fat because almost every American eats too much. The fat you do eat should come from canola and olive oil. Flax oil and borage oil in small amounts can help meet your needs for essential fatty acids. Do not eat any fat that is hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated.

Endurance athletes have very high protein needs. Don't skimp in that area.

When you are not running, eat complex carbohydrates ( whole grains, legumes, vegetables, and some fruit ). Avoid simple sugars and empty carbo calories such as canned soda. During and after running, simple sugars are OK.

Most runners do not get enough of certain vitamins and minerals, even though in theory a good diet should supply enough ( magnesium, zinc, and some of the B vitamins ). Take a vitamin/mineral capsule as an insurance policy.

Avoid processed foods which contain a lot of additives.

If your body craves a particular food, eat it.

Remember, your ancestors existed before fast food and supermarkets, and diet books. Avoid complication and worry. Use quality ingredients and enjoy your meals.

 


Vic Culp

Allan Swanson wrote:
 

"I need some help, it seems every nutrition source I find lists a different recommended totals for calorie intake and breakdown. I am pretty sure that the "60-25-15" (or thereabouts) split is reasonable, but what about one's BMR and the resulting increase of consistent training, what should the effect be on overall calorie consumption? And finally, is body weight a driver and to what extent?"

To start remember, every person is a study of one when it comes to exact caloric intake and usage and how their can use carbohydrates, fats and proteins the best.

Reference the following homepage for a pretty good paper on how each of the calories are treated by the body.

http://www.lehigh.edu/~dmd1/keri.html

Daily, you will burn calories for two reasons:

 

  1. Living and breathing (metabolism) - this is generally calculated by multiplying your current weight by 13.

     

  2. Extra Physical Activity - for example running usually burns 100 calories per mile.

     

Because every person is different, the only way to determine their reasonably precise number of calories burned daily is to trace their caloric intake and compare this with their weight change over an extended period of time. Also, water weight needs to be considered.

The constants that will not change are that 3500 calories equals one pound and one pint of water equals one pound.

So if you maintain proper hydration, you can calculate your calories used with the following formula for each week:

Knowns
-------------------------------
a = Beginning Weight lbs
b = Ending Weight Lbs
c = Calories eaten
d = miles run

To find
--------------------------------
x = metabolism calories burned
y = calories burned per mile

So

(b - a) * 3500 = c - x - (y * d)

You will need multiple weeks to be able to solve for x and y but you will get a reasonable estimate.

Once you know how many calories that you burn each week, you will know what you can eat to gain or loss weight and how calories will be burned by running more. However, as your conditioning changes your metabolism will also change. So you need to keep monitoring your intake to note these changes.

As for 60-25-15 or 40-30-30, My opinion leans toward 60% carbs, less than 15% fat and the rest in proteins. This works for me.

What also works for me is low body fat. I try to keep it under 6% and my weight around 160 lbs (6'2"). I find that I run slower above this weight and below it I risk injury from reduced muscle mass.

Probably more than you wanted to know.

 


 

Food & Energy

Article By: Monique Ryan R.D.


Monique Ryan R.D.
Find the Right Fuel the Hours Before You Race

 

Race day has arrived. You feel confident because training has been going well. Last night you devoured a large carbohydrate meal and enjoyed a good night's sleep. This morning, you are as ready as you can be. But are you really ready? What about what you ate or drank the few hours before the race?

Many factors make pre-race eating challenging. Early starts make timing tricky. A stomach tied in knots hardly promotes an appetite. And then there is the fear of your meal "talking back." So why bother with food at this tumultuous time? Because research is constantly proving that you should. It appears that carbohydrates consumed several hours before and right up to race time can significantly improve your performance.

Part of the problem is basic physiology. Athletes who race at high intensities for longer than 75-90 minutes are at risk of draining their precious carbohydrate stores. This is especially true if they have difficulty taking in enough carbohydrates while racing. Why the fuel drain? The longer your muscles work hard, the more you dip into your glycogen reserves. When your muscle reserves run low, your body relies on blood glucose. This blood glucose can be supplied by glycogen broken down from your liver (a limited supply) and carbohydrates you consume while cycling. Or it comes from glucose supplied from the pre-race meal you are still absorbing! And not only can pre-race eating keep blood glucose high, it can also "top off" muscle and liver glycogen stores, helping you start the race with the fullest tank possible. Several well-designed studies support the cause of fine-tuning pre-race eating. One study had subjects cycle for 95 minutes to drain carbohydrate reserves before completing a time trial. Those who consumed 312 g of carbohydrates four hours before cycling, completed the test, on average, eight minutes faster than cyclists who consumed no carbohydrates.

Another study had nine, well-trained cyclists perform intense exercise to exhaustion. Those who drank five grams of carbohydrate per kg of weight from a concentrated carbohydrate solution three hours prior, exercised an average of 17 percent longer than cyclists who took a placebo. It's important to note that both these studies used large carbohydrate amounts. These study results should inspire ambitious duathletes and triathletes to experiment with pre-exercise eating during training.

There are several ways you can find your new winning food combination. Eat before various "start times" with higher portions than normal. Use both liquid, solid and in-between food consistencies to find what "sits" best. And your hard work will not only pay off on race day, but also improve the quality of your training.

When to Carb Up

Many athletes who experiment with large portions find they work especially well with 3-5 hours to digest the food. But what about the hour leading to training or race time? In one study, cyclists who were fed 75 g of liquid carbohydrate one hour before, completed a time trial faster than those who ate nothing. Another group of researchers also found good results with carbohydrates one hour before. Subjects given 70 g of carbohydrate from oatmeal could exercise longer before reaching exhaustion as compared to those who got a placebo. And in a third study, subjects who consumed a carbohydrate-electrolyte sports drink one hour before running showed improved performance as compared to those who drank water. Are you wary about consuming various carbohydrates or sugars the hour before exercise? Traditionally, athletes have been warned against consuming sugar immediately before exercise. Previous studies showed that this reduced blood sugar levels. But recent studies contradict these findings. Lowered blood sugar, if it occurs, is transient, and more importantly, doesn't affect performance. But it is possible that there are some sugar-sensitive multi sport athletes out there, so experiment in training.

Even if you do perfect your pre-performance eating, do consume enough carbohydrates during exercise. While one study showed an 18 percent improvement with pre-exercise carbohydrate and a 32 percent improvement with carbohydrate during, the two combined produced a 44 percent improvement.

How do you incorporate some of these concepts into your own training and racing? Look at the list of carbohydrate foods and portions. Try to take in about one 0.5 g of carbohydrate per pound of weight for every hour you have to digest. If you weigh 150 lbs. and eat three hours before racing, you should consume 225 g of carbohydrate (150 lbs x 0.5 g/lb x 3 hours = 225 g CHO).

For close-to-starting-time eating, try getting your carbohydrates from easily digested foods. Check out your favorite sports drink. Depending on the brand, 16 oz generally supplies over 30 g of carbohydrate. Or you may want to down a tried-and-true energy bar favorite. And many athletes do well with liquid meal replacements. Everyone will have a personal winning food/liquid pre-race combination. Clearly itŐs worth experimenting to find out just what yours may be.

 

Food Portions Carbos (g)
Cranberry juice 12 oz 54 g
Banana 1 Medium 27 g
Dry cereal 1 oz 25 g
Cooked cereal 1/2 cup cooked 15 g
Bread, bagel, English, muffin 1 oz 15 g
Fruited yogurt 1 cup 43 g
Jelly 1 tbs 13 g
Rice 1 cup cooked 50 g
Energy bar 1 serving 40-60 g
Carb-electrolyte drink 16 oz 30 g
High carbohydrate beverage 16 oz 80-100 g
Meal replacement 12 oz 60 g

 


Blake P. Wood

Edward Reilly wrote:

"Just about when do I HAVE to risk eating something solid?"

Ed writes this after specifically mentioning 50k. In every one of my hundreds (6 of 'em), I've had a very rough spot at about 30 miles or 6 hours, where I suddenly feel very tired, sluggish, and out of energy. It lasts for about 30 minutes, and then goes away. I theorize that this is where my body has finally used up all the glycogen I brought with me in my muscles to the start line, and the 30 minute lull is what it takes my body to kick in replacing it from what I've been eating along the way. Furthermore, I think this is the classic "hitting the wall" symptom in marathons. Good conditioning can delay this from 20 to 30 miles, so that it wouldn't show up in a marathon, but it's still lurking out there beyond, in ultra territory.

 


Stan Jensen

When you start feeling weak or your stomach starts rumbling, you've probably waited too long. Try making "eating" a part of your training. There's lots of food types available at most ultra aid stations (e.g. melons, potatoes, etc.), so see what you can handle. I don't think I could run for 5+ hours without eating.

 


Karl King #1

First of all, what is "real" food? Are Coke, M&Ms, pretzels and Snickers "real" food? From which tree were they picked? How about condensed milk or Ensure - are those "real"? How about honey - is it "real" or is it from the Bee factory? Is anything from MickeyD's "real"?

A mathematician would say that this is a complex issue, so there must be a real part and an imaginary part. Finishing a 100 miler on imaginary food would be difficult indeed.

Muscle fibers use Adenosine Tri Phosphate for their energy requirements. Is ATP real food? Mitochondria produce ATP from molecules such as glucose, acetyl coenzyme A, and individual amino acids. Are those real food? At these molecular levels, the body does not know or care where the molecules came from.

In the digestive tract, what we eat is ripped apart by hydrochloric acid and a host of enzymes. A peanut butter and jelly sandwich does not ooze unchanged through the walls of the small intestine. For food to be taken up by the blood stream, it must be in very simple forms, which come from digested, or broken down, food. You can input the food as pizza or as a simple mix of carbo, fat, protein, vitamins and minerals. Your digestive tract will process as needed, which may be a lot, or it may be very little if the bulk of the work is already done before you eat.

The debate of "real" or something else is missing the point. Which is, that for good digestion and energy flow, the body needs a mix of carbo, fat and protein in "normal" proportions. What is "normal"?

Studies of Tour de France finishers show a remarkably similar macro nutrient profile despite the fact that different riders make different food choices. What they take is 7-10% protein, about 20% fat, with the rest coming from carbohydrate. One can concoct all the advertising hype and stuff about 30-30-40 plans, but when high performance is required, "real" people do not use 30-30-40. My experience and study suggest that 10-15-75 ( protein, fat, carbo) is a workable choice for 100 mile runs. Very fast, competitive runners may need more carbo than that.

Nearly all of the "energy" products on the market do not come close to meeting that kind of profile. Exceed, PowerBar, GU, etc either have insufficient fat, protein or both. The problem isn't that they aren't "real", it is that they are not formulated for being the sole source of energy in a very long event. And, some of them have ingredients such as fructose that will ruin one's digestion during the event. There are a lot of runners out there who had a miserable run or a DNF not because of their training or the course, but because they consumed a poorly designed energy product.

Most people run long ultras with too little fat and protein. The stomach and small intestine become overly acid, and nausea is the result, with puking the final chapter. What is "real" food? In this context, it is food that contains fat and protein. Peanut butter, cheese, milk, mayo, hamburgers, hot dogs, Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, etc are all effective not because they are in some sense "real" but because they are supplying the fat and protein not found in common energy products. I know from personal experience that if you have an "engineered" food that does supply the proper mix of nutrients, one can run for more than a day with no with no stomach upset.

Again, the commonly available energy products are not well designed for long ultras, and may cause a lot of the problems runners experience in these runs. Maybe one of the reasons that Kenyan and Tarahumara runners do so well is that they are unaware of such products and eat the stuff they've learned over the centuries works well for them. I'll bet it isn't loaded with fructose/sucrose and citric acid, but it does contain modest amounts of protein and fat.

Anybody out there have some specific information on what the Tarahumara have been eating for the last 100 years?

 


Mark Williams

 

"Adding to the informative post from Jay Hodde and Matt Mahoney on energy use in ultras, it should be noted that the runners who win races consume a lot of carbohydrate calories during their ultras. The biochemistry of the human body is such that top performance requires energy from carbs."

 

That would come as a surprise to James Zarie, 3 time winner of the Spartathlon (154 miles) and a world class multi day runner... I asked him what he ate during the Spartathlon a couple of years ago. He ate small bread roll at around 50 miles, and the occasional piece of water melon. He only drank water.

Personally I'm inclined to agree with Rich Schick (although I don't take it quite to the same extreme that he does)... train on low calorie intake, then whatever you can handle during the race will be more effective. And if you cant handle anything, its not a disaster.

 


Karl King #2

One of the problems with studies of ultra runners and their performance is that it is so difficult to set up controlled conditions which would evaluate different protocols in training and execution of a run.

The obvious question is if James Zarie (as Mark Williams wrote) would have run faster had he trained and raced with a higher carbohydrate intake. It would be instructive to take 10 different sets of identical twins, have one twin of each set train with water only, the other twin train with a higher carbohydrate intake, and then have the twins enter the same run and compete against each other. Would the low energy or high energy intake twin run faster?

It would be very interesting to survey the top 20 men and top 20 women ultra runners in the U.S. and determine their average calorie/mile intake when racing. A statistical distribution could be presented. That would show general trends across a population, rather the case for one or two individuals.

The subject may be great fun to debate for men, but there is a serious consideration when it comes to women ultra runners. Studies show that low energy intake in women results in higher levels of stress hormones, which deplete calcium stores more rapidly. That can lead to serious levels of bone loss. The losses are corrected when additional calories are taken during training.

I saw a case of this first hand with my training partner. When I first started training with her, she ran on water only. She was quite thin and running good times in marathons and 10Ks - when she wasn't injured. She ran only about half the year because she suffered a series of stress fractures. She then started running with a simple sports drink for extra calories. She put on a few pounds, and her times slowed a bit, but she suffered no more stress fractures.

 


Jay Hodde

Karl wrote:
 

"As I recall, Jay Hodde ran for some time with only water because he did not like the sports drinks he had tried, then found one he liked and now runs ultras with a sports drink. It would be interesting to read about his findings on those two different strategies."

 

Well, as an experiment of one, I've had good luck with the sports drink I have chosen. My times are faster, and I have a lot more energy through the course of the event. I can't however, credit the drink for all of my enhanced performance, as training and experience must also play into the success.

The drink problem for me was more complicated than just not liking the drink -- I would just throw it up. It was useless for me. I instead chose water for my first ultras, and had few stomach problems.

When I tried the new drink, I found that I could stomach it -- as long as it wasn't that icky orange flavor. I now use it (along with water) on a regular basis for any run longer than the marathon.

 


Dr. Bill Misner

My Doctoral Dissertation concerned itself with whether human musculature would efficiently-immediately perform endurance activities when fueled with an admixtures of 40% Carbohydrate, 30% Protein, and 30% Fat. In a rather thorough review of research literature, I found numerous studies which support of the principle of adaptation, I.E. whatever food sources you ingest, your body is able and apt to adapt and oxidize food-fuels for the extreme demands of endurance performance. Dietary Analysis shows that most endurance athletes ingest between the ranges of 46-65% Carbohydrates, and 30-38% Fat.(Misner WD, DIETARY ANALYSIS OF ATHLETES, 1996-1997) Of the Dietary Analysis queried from a field of 26 athletes, only 2 of the athlete's normal dietary intake approached the 40-30-30 protocols, or 8%. Natural foods containing a 40-30-30-(CHO-PRO-FA) makeup are few: Wheat Germ 41-28-31, Mushrooms 41-28-31, Brewers Yeast 36-36-27, Turnip Greens 44-36-20, Endive & Celery Stalks 38-19-40, Cabbage & Asparagus 38-19-40. Does not sound too appetizing, unless you are deviated from taste population norms substantially.

I found many numerous studies which show that if an athlete habitually ingests a high percentage of fat in his/her diet, but trains their body toward endurance fitness, that their body will slowly adapt dietary intake conversion of dietary fatty acids to energy-substrate mitochondrial fuels upon demand. When, however, I reviewed other studies by Hultman 1967), Costill(1981), Noakes (1988), and Sherman(1983), I found that untrained athletes stored 14 grams/kg. glycogen(from dietary Carbohydrate) wet muscle weight, whereas trained fit athletes scored a whooping 38 grams/kg. wet muscle glycogen! Costill's 1980 research showed that the athlete who trained on a 70% carbohydrate(CHO) caloric percentage intake, not only stored more glycogen per wet-muscle weight, but also was able to train at a higher pace/rate/duration than the athlete who ate only 40% carbohydrates by percentage of calories eaten in 4 days. Long slow-distance runners tend, however, to store higher levels of muscle-triglycerides than do shorter distance runners. Dr. D.C. Nieman in "The Sports medicine Fitness Course", Bull Publishing: Page 141, states that fat oxidation cannot sustain metabolic rates much above 50% VO-2 Max rates. This rate of expenditure/effort would be adequate for 24-hour events but inadequate for optimal performance in distances of 50 miles or less. When Carbohydrate(Carbs or CHO) is oxidized from wet-muscle-glycogen to form energy from ATP synthesis, it doubles the rate of fat oxidation into the same ATP substrate.(1.0 mol/min for Carbs-0.5 mol/min for fat) Push the pace in an all-out sprint, then CHO selection jumps to huge 2.4 mol/min, while fat oxidation still remains 0.5 mol/min, or 5 times slower than the CHO to ATP sprint rate. It is little wonder why sport scientists recommend a diet of 55-70% Complex Carbohydrates, less than 30% Fat, and the remain 15% in Protein.

What were the conclusive results of my Dissertation? We concluded, after testing 21 athletes in 8 states, in a variety of endurance activities, that the human body would adapt endurance performance to dietary intake of 40-30-30 energy substrates consumed 2 hours prior to and every hour during training upon demand. We documented a statistically significant 95.23% performance adaptation to the 40-30-30 caloric protocol prior to and during endurance activities.

After careful review of the other research literature on a wide variety of fuel selection protocols, I concluded that the same diet that enhances optimal health is the same one that maximizes optimal endurance performance. The results from my research concluded that the 40-30-30 dietary plan neither optimizes performance nor health, but may testify to the adaptability of human physiology to fuel selection upon demand.

 


Jay Hodde #2

Rich wrote:

I find no argument in what you state and in fact you echo my sentiments. Eat a balanced diet and train hard. Yet I'm still left to postulate that my original premise that a weekly (more or less) single fasting long training run might help in adaptation of the body to utilize fats more efficiently during ultras. This is in no way inconsistent with maintaining a balanced diet overall.

 

But is a single long training run each week sufficient to help the body adapt to more efficient fat utilization? My gut instinct would tell me that it is not, based on my knowledge of adaptation in general.

 


Mark Williams

Karl wrote:

 

"It is interesting to note that with consistent training, the human body can adapt to almost any energy intake strategy. Rich gives us his thoughts on a minimalist energy intake. At the other end of the scale is Yannis Kouros. The following excerpts are taken from Dr. Tim Noakes' "Lore of Running" pages 352 and 353 where he discusses Kouros' 1985 960km Sydney to Melbourne race ( which he won ).

His daily energy expenditure ranged from 15,367 Kcal on the first day to 7,736 Kcal on the fifth day, and his daily energy intake varied from 13,770 Kcal on the first day to 7,800 Kcal on the fifth day. Overall, his total estimated energy intake ( 55,970 Kcal ) exceeded his energy expenditure ( 55,079 Kcal ).

To maintain this high rate of energy consumption, Kouros ate every 15 minutes...

Carbohydrates provided 96% of his total energy intake.

Clearly, two factors contribute most significantly to Kouros' success. First, he has a remarkable ability to go without sleep for prolonged periods. Second, he has a capacity to maintain a high rate of energy consumption during these races. This parallels findings in cyclists competing in the formidable Tour de France. Only those cyclists whose rates of daily energy consumption equal their rates of energy utilization are able to finish the race."

I can understand this in TDF riders... they are only (!) out racing for about 5 hours a day, and most of the calorie intake occurs before/after the ride. Similarly for the trans America foot race... there is no doubt that failure to eat enough will result in disaster... but that doesn't mean they necessarily eat vast amounts while running (perhaps some of the competitors could comment)...

Bob Slate described James Zarie's eating habits during the Hiroshima to Nagasaki (stage) race... he ate relatively little during the runs, but made up for it in between (and from some of the stories I've heard at the Spartathlon, I think bob may have been understating the amount of food James put away between stages :-)

But from the above post, I have to admit I find Kouros' eating ability amazing... even more so than his running ability :-)

I'm wondering how much of that intake was while running (a.k.a the Sydney to Melbourne race is not a stage race?). Presumably the day one total is high because of food consumed prior to the start, and the last day probably includes food consumed after the finish... that still leaves a lot to be accounted for! Did he really eat all that while running, or did he take eating/sleeping breaks too?

Im sure we can both go on finding examples of runners who eat lots vs runners who hardly eat at all :-) but speaking of the Sydney to Melbourne race, there was also a 60 year old who won it one year, who only ate watermelon throughout the race...

Anyway, back to the original point which was "it should be noted that the runners who win races consume a lot of carbohydrate calories during their ultras". My first reaction to this was, well probably a lot do, but there are certainly plenty that don't... so I gave a counter example.

But now I think about it, what does "a lot" mean in that sentence? I can only suppose it means "more than those who don't win", since there is no other point of reference... and I'm beginning to doubt that is correct. I am almost certain that a calorie/mile profile of the runners in a ultra of say 50 to 100k would show that the front runners eat the least, and the back of the packers eat the most. I really cant believe that Don Ritchie was wolfing food down while averaging sub six minute miles when he set the 100k record :-)

And having brought up the rear as a pacer at WS a couple of times, I also have to doubt that Mike Morton could have been putting away as much food as some of the folks on 30 hour pace...

I seem to recall a post to the list (I think by Tim Noakes) a couple of years ago, describing the prevailing attitude to running 100s 20+ years ago... which was not to eat *at all*, and to only drink water at 40 & 70 miles... and there were some pretty impressive performances on that regime (he was _not_ suggesting that this was a good way to run 100s, and nor am I, just pointing out that it really doesn't make a lot of difference to performance, providing you train appropriately).

 

"If a runner enjoys running ultras on water only ( essentially a starvation diet ), more power to him/her. My personal preference is to train myself to run in a well-fed condition. I just have no desire to starve myself when I'm expending 8,000 Kcal/day."
There is no question that you must replace the calories you burn, regardless of how much running you are doing. If you are expending 8000 Kcal/day you must be running around 50-60M per day... If you are really doing that then I stand in awe (and perhaps you should send your totals in to Matt... you would be the only person running fast enough to make the 100 year cutoff :-)

If you are simply saying that you wouldn't want to starve on the odd days that you run a 50 mile race then that's different... I would typically eat around 2000Kc the morning of a 50, probably around 500-1000 during the race and spend the rest of the day eating. Taking a few days carbo loading into account too this hardly amounts to starvation :-)

 


Robert Thomas

Upon examining any sports drink or food that contains only carbohydrates, BCAA, whey protein and MCT in it's formula, you can immediately see that with so few ingredient types included that the scope of the performance expectations one could achieved is severely limited. Yes all these four food types are very important. But there is obviously far more to consider about a high performance sports food, above and beyond these four ingredient types and what they have to offer the athlete. Any sport food formula containing only these four food types can hardly be considered the final word on what an ultra drink, ultra gel or any endurance food should be.

There are really two distinct food types to consider when thinking about what foods to ingest during an ultra event. First and most important is your primary carbohydrate fluid replacement drink; this type of drink should contain much more than just electrolytes, carbohydrates and water to be a modern and High-Tec formula. Then there are all other food types that would be more like complete meals, these foods could be bars, gels, drinks and real food, these foods would contain complete proteins, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins, minerals, fiber, in various types and amount. Other foods beyond what is included in a primary drink become more important with increasing time of the athletic event. I think you need two different types of food because at it's simplest meals that contain large amounts of compete foods displace carbohydrates that you need for energy and slow down the absorption of water. If you eat complete foods to get the carbohydrates you need to maximize performance, you will ingest to great an amount of other food types like protein and fats along with your carbohydrates. The pre event meal should contain all your sports supplements and load you up with carbohydrates, fats, and proteins ETC. When you start your event you want to be energy replete. Then you start off using your primary carbohydrate drink. Only later in the event do you start eating complete food sporadically. You don't eat a steak diner at 20 mile into a marathon. It may be a good idea to eat that same dinner before you start or at 75 mile in a hundred mile run. Of course your drinking or eating you primary carbohydrate drink or food from start to finish.

Looking at the primary carbohydrate drink or food that contains just the four-ingredient types BCAA, MCT, carbohydrates and whey protein. There is allot that can be right or wrong using these four ingredient types depending on exactly how a sports drink or food is put together.

The first consideration is palatability and taste; this is really a very important issue where most manufactures of sports foods go wrong, then the more important issues of what do each of these particular ingredient types included in the sports food have to offer.

Glucose polymers are a really great form of carbohydrates for energy during exercise. But there are questions about what type of glucose polymers are included in a powdered sports drink or food, are they the fast or longer absorbing types, are the polymers agglomerated for easier mixing or are they the cheaper non agglomerated type that clump when mixed with water. What are the total amount of glucose polymer calories and ratios to other ingredients? There are many energy-related issues as to why you might include other carbohydrate types (fructose, sugar, dextrose, ETC) in a sports food; these other carbohydrates are not apparently included in Clip or many other sports foods. Research has proven the superiority of mixing carbohydrate types in a sport food; that's if you do it right.

Whey protein is a wonderful product but at it's simplest it contains unnecessary amino acids for a primary carbohydrates containing sports drink, these unnecessary amino acids displace and dilutes other ingredients and carbohydrates making a primary carbohydrate drink less effective in providing muscle energy calories. Whey protein also can inhibit digestion, if your effort is low and if the included amounts are small this is less of a factor. If you ingest large amounts of a sports drink or food so you can have highest amount of energy giving carbohydrates available for your muscles; You can see with simple math, if that carbohydrate food has too much protein mixed in with it, you can ingest far too much protein during the course of the event along with your carbohydrates. A simple example of a 15 percent protein to 85 percent carbohydrate mixture would give you during a hundred mile run 225 grams of protein, if you ingested 50 grams per hour for 30 hours. If you ingested 100 grams an hour that would be 450 grams of protein in 30 hours and this discounts any other protein containing foods before or during the 100 mile run. You might think you should not drink or ingest that large amount of your carbohydrate containing sports drink or food. But to get the most out of a carbohydrate drink or food you need to eat 100 to approximately 120 grams of carbohydrates per hour of constant hard exercise.

BCAA can be a useful addition to the overall diet when running but again the use and need in a primary carbohydrate sports drink is marginal. BCAA are better ingested before and after exercise or in a secondary drink or food. BCAA have a bitter taste making a drink less palatable if they are included in any useful amount. But most sports formulas include very little BCAA, because they are very expensive and make the product cost much more to make. It's used as a marketing gimmick more often than not. It takes several grams of BCAA per hour of hard exercise to start having any real muscle sparing effect. There is limited and conflicting information on the performance enhancing effects during endurance exercise. Most of the positive effects have to do with recovery after exercise. Total diet and the total amount of all proteins in your diet before, during and after exercise has a strong influence in what positive effects can be derived by inclusion of extra free form BCAA in any of the foods you eat during exercise or in the primary sport drink.

MCT are always being touted as some sort of superior energy source. They are unique in some ways and have interesting metabolic effects separate from an energy providing substrate. They are a quickly metabolize form of fat and do give you quick energy. But compared to an all carbohydrate mix they are inferior, when mixed in with carbohydrates in low amount, MCT have some marginal usefulness. There is no clear-cut case of superiority when MCT are mixed in with carbohydrates in providing muscle energy, when compared with only carbohydrates. MCT are not very good tasting so any product that contains any usable and effective level will not taste as good as it mite. Most products only put in a token amount for marketing reason. Small amounts of MCT maybe useful in promoting some positive metabolic effects apart and separate from providing energy, but it takes many days of use for these effects to begin, but small amounts are next to useless in providing the large amounts of calories needed for energy while exercising. Ingesting large amounts of MCT quickly is unhealthy for you, because it puts too much fat into the blood stream all at once. So you can't use them for a primary fuel source even if you wanted to and you sure don't want to. I do think fat in the diet during long events is a good thing but there are many different types of fats and the final word as to which ones and at what amount are best suited for endurance exercise needs more study. The best advice about eating fatty foods in a race is if you crave it and it tastes good eat it.

There was a post by Rich containing an abstract titled "Effects of medium-chain triglyceride ingestion on fuel metabolism and cycling performance", purporting the advantages of MCT mixed with carbohydrates. Itis clearly a flawed study; first the use of 6 athletes is to small a number to generate a really fair comparison, you need more than that. Secondly and more importantly the total calories where different between the carbohydrates only and carbohydrates and MCT trials. How can you compare less carbohydrate calories ingested with the carbohydrate only trail with more calories ingested with the carbohydrate plus MCT trial, it's a very unfair and unevenly weighted test of the effectiveness of the two different food trials. The mean difference of approximately 1 « minute resulting in 65.1 to 66.8 minutes total time between the two sets of trials is not a very great difference and can be accounted for by just normal variations in performance between the different trial. I do think 1 « minutes is a very important difference in an hour and 5 minute time trial, if you could prove that it's something your eating improving your speed. After studying this paper you can only conclude that MCT in the dose given mixed with carbohydrates does not harm performance, but does not prove any superiority over using only carbohydrate. This is a good example of why it's hard to know what your doing in trying to figure out what diets work best, when papers are published by respected author's that confuse the issues of what food types are better for athletic performance.

Lastly there is everything else you could possible include in making your primary sports drink or food the most effective performance enhancing formula possible. This is where the hard work begins and I will leave that for another day.

 


Karl King #3

Mark Williams and Dan Brannen provided a number of interesting comments. Thanks, Dan, for the info on Kouros.

Like Mark, I find Korous' ability to eat on the run amazing. I routinely train by taking 30-40 Kcal/mile, and run an ultra on 50-60 Kcal/mile. Taking in 100 Kcal/mile as Kouros did is more food than I can comfortably handle, and I train to eat on the run.

Mark wrote:

 

"But now I think about it, what does "a lot" mean in that sentence? I can only suppose it means "more than those who don't win", since there is no other point of reference... and I'm beginning to doubt that is correct. I am almost certain that a calorie/mile profile of the runners in a ultra of say 50 to 100k would show that the front runners eat the least, and the back of the packers eat the most. I really cant believe that Don Ritchie was wolfing food down while averaging sub six minute miles when he set the 100k record :-)"

 

From what I witnessed while crewing for Kevin and Kris Setnes in some of their ultras showed that consumption varies with the individual. A few ate little ( sorry, no quantitative data ), while others pounded sports drink, GU and Coke. As Rich noted, the body has a harder time digesting food when running ( blood flow is shunted away from the digestive system to exercising muscle ). So competitive runners tend to eat less than other who are running a more comfortable pace. But if we had the quantitative data, I think that some would be found to eat a lot of calories, primarily carbos. Obviously, this is calling out for a study of top runners so that we have some hard numbers.

 

"There is no question that you must replace the calories you burn, regardless of how much running you are doing. If you are expending 8000 Kcal/day you must be running around 50-60M per day..."

 

Sigh, I wish that were possible, but my mileage is rather meager. The 8,000 refers to running an ultra.

One interesting point that strikes me in the examples of very low calorie intake, very high calorie intake, and my own moderate intake is that whatever the value, the rate of calories in is stable. Gorging and then taking nothing for many miles is going to put the digestive system through a feed-starve cycle with big changes in insulin levels. That may explain why some runners have the "blues" in their runs. Rich's protocol of very low calories during the run will produce a stable insulin level, as will Kouros' eating every 10 to 15 minutes. The two levels may be different, but they should be stable. Over the years of training, I've gotten used to taking some sports drink every 10 minutes from the bottle I carry.

Mark says that:

 

"I would typically eat around 2000Kc the morning of a 50, probably around 500-1000 during the race..."

 

I'm lucky if early in the morning I can eat 300 calories before a 4 am ultra. But then I take 2500 calories during a 50 miler. So Mark is taking 2500-3000 calories for his run while I'm doing about 2800.

Thanks for sharing the information. Nobody has enough time to learn all there is to know about these matters by their own personal experience. The neat thing about the Lists is that by sharing information we can learn more than we ever could on our own.

 


George Beinhorn

The big problems in an ultra are: (1) Energy and (2) Health.

 

  • Energy
    Energy, Part I. Basic is a supply of fuel. If you haven't tested fructose-containing race drinks in training, I'd suggest you avoid them during the race. These include Gatorade, Exceed, etc. They can really give you a "bonk" at 18+ and 30+ miles. I personally pack little flat cosmetic squeeze bottles that I buy at the drugstore for 79 cents and fill with Energy Surge in a very high concentration. Use it for 30+ miles until it tastes yucky, then switch to Coke/Pepsi, etc. I'm working on more natural ways to do ultras and have had good preliminary results but am not ready to pass along advice to others.

    Energy, Part II. Take electrolytes. You can get Electrolyte Stamina Tablets (Trace Minerals brand) from some health food store. Other electrolyte pills will probably do you okay in a 50M.

    Energy, Part III. Plan your running and walking strategy wisely. Lots of people advise beginners to run 25 minutes and walk 5 minutes. But that is <> more stressful than running 5 minutes and walking 1 minute. 5:1 is magic. It really works. A friend of mine ran AR50 in 10:15 straight through, then came back the next year and ran 8:24 using 5:1, including a 20-minute stop to eat in his RV halfway through the race.

    Energy, Part IV. The brain is heavily involved in ultrarunning. Take care of it. I take along a couple of low-potency vitamin B's and take them at about 28-30 miles. Vitamin B is the cheerfulness vitamin, and it helps. Also, the brain is the most glucose-hungry organ in the body, and taking plain sugars at the aid stations late in the race can keep you going mentally, whether in the form of Coke or gummy bears or hard candies. In Enviro-Sports events, I would ask ahead of time wha will be available at the aid stations. One thing about taking simple sugars is, you don't want your supply to run out! You might even carry some hard candies in your belt pack or put them in your drop bag.

    Energy, Part V. What's your body type? Are you a lean, 2% body fat speedster? Or are you a typical slightly pudgy ultrarunner? :-). If you can tolerate caffeine, you might take along some GU. If you don't handle it well in daily life, don't expect to rely on it in a race. Sure it'll get you through but your mood won't be lighthearted and happy.

     

  • Health
    Health. This means feet. I wrap my feet comfortably in duct tape (not too tight, not too loose, no wrinkles) and have not had blisters in any trail races I've run this way. I also wear Trail Gators. Go cautiously on the downhills to avoid spraining an ankle.

    Mind: Be ready for "anything" including a DNF. It happens. When I DNF'd at a long trail race, a seasoned ultrarunner at the aid station cheered me greatly when he said, "Hey, don't worry about it. It's a learning experience. I've DNF'd in so many ultras I can't count 'em all." Every ultra is a crapshoot. Just do your best without holding expectations, and enjoy the great adventure. Best of luck!

     


    Shawn McDonald

    A steady caloric intake is very important in running ultras, even more so as events get longer (100 miles and beyond). Over the period of a few months you should be able to find a number of foods and/or beverages that you handle well (no or little stomach discomfort), that taste good to you, and that are "packable" while doing your long training runs. As to the rate of intake, try for about 300-400 calories an hour, which works out to maybe 12-16 ounces of a sports drink and an energy bar per hour. This is not a lot. Try to eat about every 30-40 minutes, as this keeps up your energy level without a lot of bulk for your stomach to handle at any one time. If you go with a mostly liquid food intake, try to take it at a rate of several ounces about every 20 minutes. Mix that in with some drinks of just water. If you handle solid food ok, there are lots of options. Sandwiches of various types, energy bars, fruit, pretzels (also for salt), and granola type mixes are good choices. Shoot for mostly carbohydrates, with maybe 20% of calories from fats and 10% from proteins. In the later stages of longer ultras (50 miles plus) you might get "tired" of the same old stuff and go to things like soup, energy gels, and supplimented drinks like Ensure that might be easier for you to digest.

    So I suggest you try out a number of different foods and drinks on your upcoming training runs. With the 300-400 cal./hr intake you replace about 50% of the calories you burn, keep up your blood sugar, and allow for continued burning of stored fats which in long distance races is a significant fuel source. If you do encounter stomach troubles, there are a few things to try to combat this. These would include things like antacid tablets, going only with liquid intake, and trying to ensure your salt intake is adequate. For some, drinking milk or eating higher fat foods will help a sour stomach. One other thing to try is eating while you walk for several minutes, and to eat on uphills a ways before you get to longer downhill sections. Also consider that you might have more stomach problems in hot or humid weather, so plan accordingly for those types of races with regard to your drop bags and what is on hand at the aid stations.

    Good luck with finding foods and beverages that work for you.



     

     

    Carbohydrates


    Matt Mahoney #1

    "Frozen" Ed Furtaw wrote:
     

    "What are the differences if any (as related to their use before/during/after running an ultra) between "complex carbohydrates" and "glucose polymers"? Also, is "maltodrextrine" (or is it "maltodextrose"?) the same as either of those first two?

     

    Maltodextrine, or starch, is a glucose polymer, a complex carbohydrate, a large molecule made by linking together long chains of sugar molecules. In the stomach, the long chains are quickly broken down into simple sugars, so it doesn't make much difference what form you get your carbs from. The big difference is that sugar is sweet and starch is not, so drinks containing only complex carbohydrates (like Conquest) are artificially sweetened.

    It is probably more important to distinguish glucose from fructose. Glucose is absorbed faster, so a high fructose drink (like Powerade) is more likely to cause stomach problems than a lower fructose drink (like Gatorade) if you consume it at the maximum rate of 200 calories per hour. Sucrose, (table sugar) is a polymer of length 2, consisting of one glucose and one fructose molecule. Starch, maltodextrin, etc., contains hundreds of glucose molecules (no fructose). Many drinks contain fructose because it's twice as sweet as glucose or sucrose. Also, most foods contain high fructose corn syrup because it's cheaper than sugar (at least in the U.S. because of the Cuban trade embargo and farm subsidies).

     


    Blake Woods

    Maltodextrine is synonymous with "glucose polymer", and probably with "complex carbohydrate". It's three glucose molecules connected together. I've been told that this is the active ingredient in most specialty sports drinks, in addition to the high calorie drink powders they sell football players to bulk up at the beginning of the season. The one's you buy have other additives, the most significant of which I think is caffeine. I buy maltodextrine for $2-$3/lb at the local homebrew shop, add some crushed No-Doz, and have used this with some success in my workouts and hundreds. I like it because it's completely without taste and doesn't gum up my mouth or give me acid sores like some sports drinks do. Dave Cooper and I did some back-of-the-envelope calculations, and figured that this stuff supplied about 1000 calories/lb, or 60 calories/film can (1 fl. oz.), which is how I carry it.

     


    Karl King#1

    "Glucose polymers" is a very inexact term for carbohydrates made from multiple glucose molecules ( stuck together like legos, for a crude analogy ).

    Maltodextrin is a class of glucose polymers characterized by medium length, simple chains of molecules. When the chains get to be only a few glucose molecules long, the carbos are classed as sugars. When the chains get very long, they are classed as starches.

    A glucose molecule has 6 carbon atoms, numbered 1 through 6 on a diagram of the molecule. Dextrins are formed by linking the 1-4 positions, forming a long chain. The molecules can also link at the 1-6 positions forming branching chains. Those are amylopectins.

    As a simple generalization, "complex" carbohydrates have many glucose molecules arranged in a complex structure. These structures cannot be digested directly. From the mouth to the stomach, these structures are broken down into simple glucose molecules by the action of enzymes called amylases. This happens slowly, so that the carbohydrate energy is doled out over a long time. The production of insulin is correspondingly reduced. Simple sugars, such as glucose or sucrose ( a combination of glucose and fructose ) are absorbed very rapidly and produce a large insulin pulse if taken in quantity.

    Before a long run, you'd like complex carbos to stick with you for a while.

    During an ultra, if you can only eat every few hours, take complex carbos. If you can get carbos by drinking from a bottle whenever you like, simple sugars or maltodextrins are great, especially if you are pushing a pace. My personal preference is for maltodextrins because they have low sweetness, and I do not tire of them.

    Drinks with fructose can cause big problems with some runners who get bloating and diarrhea from that sugar. Sucrose can cause the same problem because the sucrose molecule is glucose and fructose combined. Typical canned sodas have a large amount of fructose or sucrose, so may cause problems if used throughout an ultra. Some sodas also supply caffeine, and the combination of a lot of simple sugar with caffeine can give quite a pick-up in the later stages of a long run.

    Immediately after an ultra ( 15 minutes ) your body will re-load carbo like mad, so give it simple sugars. The re-load capability ebbs after the first hour, so then it is better to go with complex carbos to trickle in a steady supply. It is also natural to crave fat after an ultra. [ My weird craving after a very long run is fried liver and onions, with mashed potatoes and salty gravy on the side. ]

    Finally, though specific biochemical reactions can be very challenging to understand, the basics of good nutrition are not difficult. Anyone who is interested in quality of life should take the decision to study nutrition as a life-long project. Actually, the more you learn, the simpler the practice of healthy eating becomes. Knowing the fundamentals will also inoculate you against nutritional fads and snake oil sales pitches.

     


    Karl King#2

    I can tell from my own training and racing that my dietary needs change greatly depending on what I'm doing. To try and force myself to follow one set of numbers in % fat, % protein and % carbo would be silly.

    It is also silly to talk about %carbo as if all carbos are the same. Glycemic index plays an important part in insulin response. 70% carbo as glucose will give you a huge insulin response, while 70% carbo from legumes and vegetables will give a very low insulin response.

    Consider the time before, during, immediately after, and following a long run.

    Before the run, you'd like a lot of complex carbos. During the run, you'd like a steady infusion of glucose or glucose polymers. Immediately after the run you'd like easily digestible protein and glucose. Following the run, you'd like protein and complex carbos. Trying to describe this as X% is just too oversimplified to be correct.

    The target of 30% protein doesn't make much sense either. Consider all of the vegetarians who run very well on far less. Even in an ultra, only 9% of the calories needed for running come from protein. If you eat 3000 calories per day, 30% would imply 900 calories from protein, or 225 grams. Ultra runners need more protein than body builders, and even at that, seldom need more than 100 grams per day. Excess protein will have to be broken down (ammonia produced ) and that is hard on the kidneys.

    My experience is that I do well on a low-protein vegetarian type lunch, but a higher protein meal with a small amount of lean meat for dinner. Again, trying to force everything into a single set of numbers doesn't square with reality.

    How much fat do you need? It depends on the quality. You have to have the right essential fatty acids. If your sources of fat are rich in those, you don't need much. Zero fat diets are a disaster waiting to happen. Your body will store quality fats and use them up over a long period of time if you get no fat. At some point those stores will be used up, and then the immune system can be seriously weakened. If the body is normally 10-30% fat, how can a zero fat diet be healthy?

    Instead of worrying about percentages, I think it is more important to learn what constitutes quality food sources which provide the nutrition your body needs. I'm a great believer that most people will, given quality foods, select what is appropriate for their needs on average.

    If you understand glycemic index, the role of anti-oxidants, and the role and sources of essential fatty acids, you will have most of what you need to eat healthy without concern for percentages.

     


    Tom Hayes

    I am a part time vegetarian, mainly trying to avoid fat, and a full time chemist. I am surprised that so many people are trying to argue this essential amino acid issue based on so little knowledge. We are still faintly instinctual beasts so our urges can be very roughly related to our needs. However, these urges are far more related to how we have conditioned ourselves. Hence it is a lousy argument to use while relating food to a body's ability to repair itself. Dana is almost entirely correct, those two amino acids cannot be produced by the body and they are necessary for the most efficient connective tissue reconstruction. But I believe there are some vegetable sources though it is not easy to find and bioavailability is arguable. I also believe your body can work around that lacking and can still construct connective tissue. It is not the same quality and some people undoubtedly do better than others so you may be able to get by. But I would have to agree with Dana that many, many injuries or slow recoveries can be attributed to lysine/methionine deficiency. So it is up to you, there are trade-offs to every diet but you need to be more educated about it than primordial urges and reasonable injury recovery history thus far.

    Speaking of diets. I just had the following article sent to me by a four time Tevis Cup finisher who thought us runners might be interested.



     

    CARBOHYDRATES? They aren't that simple!
    By:
    Louise M. Burke
    Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia

     

    Nutritionists like me have succeeded in convincing athletes to think of carbs as their best fuel source. What they may not recognize is that carbs cannot be lumped into one category. Most athletes have even heard that there are simple and complex carbohydrates. However, pardon the pun, carbs are more complex than that. When it comes to planning their training meals, athletes need to understand and use the glycemic index.

    For years, carbohydrate sources have been labeled as simple (containing sugars like glucose and sucrose) or complex (containing fiber and starch) based on the structure of the main carbohydrate. Simple carbohydrate foods have been charged with causing large and rapid changes in blood glucose. They are alleged to cause a rapid rise followed by a rapid and often greater fall - this is known as rebound hypoglycemia or the "sugar blues". Simple carbohydrates have also been considered to be lacking in nutrient value. On the other hand, it has been believed that the digestion and absorption of complexcarbohydrate foods is slower, producing a flatter and more sustained blood glucose and insulin response. Complex carbohydrate foods have also been regarded as being more "healthy" or "nutritious".

    While this classification system may have been developed as a quick education tool for the lay person, it has become a major headache for nutritionists. Because we now know that the effect of specific carbohydrate foods on the blood glucose response is neither simple nor predictable. During the 1970s, diabetes specialists were amazed to find that simple carbohydrate foods did not always produce the high and short-lived blood glucose responses traditionally attributed to them. For example, fruit and sweetened dairy products produce a flattened blood glucose curve when they are eaten. The old no-no, sugar sucrose), has a medium blood sugar profile. Curiously, some foods high in complex carbohydrates (e.g. bread and potatoes) produce a rapid blood glucose response, similar to that following the ingestion of glucose itself. Even the presence of dietary fiber in foods does not always delay absorption and flatten the after-meal blood glucose curve. For example, blood glucose responses to whole-grain breads are similar to those after eating white bread. The glycemic index (GI) was introduced in the early 1980s to classify the real effects of carbohydrate-rich foods on blood glucose levels. The GI is a ranking of foods based on their measured blood glucose response compared to that following a standard food. In some laboratories the standard food is glucose, while other scientists prefer to use white bread.

    Tables of the glycemic index of a large number of carbohydrate-rich foods have now been published internationally. The numbers vary according to who measured them and the exact type of food. For example, there are a lot of different types of "white bread" in the world. And even things like potatoes and rice come in a variety of plant types. Each has a slightly different GI. Generally, nutritionists now divide foods into those that have a high GI (bread, potatoes, breakfast cereal, glucose-based sports drinks), a moderate GI (sugar, soft drinks, tropical fruit) or a low GI (dairy foods, lentils, legumes, oats, cold climate fruits such as apples). Some foods sit on the borderline, but this is not really a problem. The real interest is in foods that are extremely different in their GI. And the real message is that there is no way to predict blood glucose responses to eating specific foods without these actual measures.

    Now that we know the effect of specific food items on blood glucose responses, we can advise people who want to control their blood glucose profiles during the day or after meals. In other words, you can eat the same amount of carbohydrate, but manipulate whether you want blood glucose spikes during the day (eat high and moderate GI foods), or a more even level (low GI foods). Diabetics are a classic example of a population that benefits from tight control of blood glucose and low GI foods. People with high blood lipid levels may also benefit from being able to achieve a more even blood glucose profile that has smaller rises and falls during the day. The glycemic index may also be a useful tool in weight control, since low GI foods have recently been shown to produce a longer-lasting "satisfaction" after meals - you don't feel hungry quite so soon. A recently published book, The G.I. Factor, has made this information widely accessible.

    Some people have quickly grabbed on to the idea that altering the GI of specific meals or the training diet may influence training and performance. The focus is on optimizing the muscle carbohydrate fuel sources, particularly for prolonged moderate-intensity exercise. Research at the Australian Institute of Sport, in conjunction with researchers at Deakin University and University of Melbourne, has examined the use of GI in sport.

    The following guidelines are drawn from this research.

     

    1. The glycemic index may be useful in sport and deserves further attention. However, it is not intended to provide a single way to rank the virtues of carbohydrate foods. There are many other features of foods which may be of value to the athlete, such as nutritional value or practicality. Sometimes foods need to be chosen because they are tasty, portable, cheap, easy to prepare and unlikely to cause stomach upsets. These issue are specific to the individual and the exercise situation. In other words, foods must always be chosen to fit the "Big Picture" and not one single issue. In the case of food eaten before or during exercise, the athlete should practice any strategies in training so that they can be assessed and fine-tuned.

       

    2. Despite early speculation, there is insufficient evidence to support the statement that all athletes will benefit from eating low GI carbohydrate meals prior to prolonged exercise. The idea is that a more sustained glucose response might sustain fuel and performance. In fact, in sports events where carbohydrate stores can become depleted, the typical way to sustain the carbohydrate supply during exercise is to consume carbohydrate during the event. The athlete should let practical issues and individual experience guide the choice of a pre-event meal. You may happen to like a carbohydrate food that is low GI (e.g. pasta), or you may find that your choices tend to foods with a high glycemic index such as rice, breakfast cereal, toast. Both choices can work.

       

    3. For specific individuals or during unique training situations, a low GI pre-event meal may be of particular benefit. Some athletes show an exaggerated and negative response when they eat carbohydrate foods in the hour before exercise. About 5% of the population experience a rebound hypoglycemia or blood sugar drop - and they feel terrible. Why this response occurs in some people is unknown. During unusual endurance sessions such as open water swimming where practical difficulties prevent the athlete from consuming carbohydrate during the session, the pre-event meal may have greater bearing on metabolism and fuel availability during the event, and a low GI carbohydrate meal may sustain blood glucose, and performance.

       

    4. Athletes performing prolonged exercise should consume carbohydrate during the event to supply additional fuel and thereby enhance their performance. Which carbohydrate drink or food to consume depends generally on their previous experience, the logistics of the event, gastrointestinal comfort and the need for fluid replacement. A carbohydrate source of moderate to high GI appears to be sensible - such as a glucose-based sports drink. However, practical issues and individual tastes are more important than GI when choosing a carbohydrate source for prolonged exercise situations.

       

    5. Moderate and high GI carbohydrate foods appear to enhance glycogen recovery after exercise compared with low GI foods. The reason for this is not clear. The most important point, however, in post exercise refueling is to eat enough total carbohydrate. We give recommendations to athletes about how much carbohydrate they should consume immediately after exercise and throughout the day to meet their refueling needs. Foods must be available and appetizing to the athlete so that these recommendations can be met. It is OK to let some favorite low GI carbohydrate foods contribute to total fuel intake - especially if these are foods that are handy and easy to eat. However, it makes sense to focus on carbohydrate foods and drinks with a moderate to high GI for glycogen recovery. The overall message: choose what is practical.

       

    Brand Miller, J., Foster-Powell, K., & Colagiuri, S.(1996). The G.I. Factor: The Glycaemic Index Solution. Sydney, Australia: Hodder and Stoughton.

     


    Karl King #3

    I never met a carbohydrate I didn't like.

    Insulin is a wonderful substance, without which, we would die.

    My personal preference is to eat meals with carbos that have a relatively low glycemic index. High GI meals taste good but leave me hungry a few hours later.

    However, when I run, I want a drink with a moderately high GI, taken relatively frequently in small doses ( a swallow or two ). As soon after the run as possible, I like a drink or food with a very high GI. Right after running, the enzymes which assist re-loading muscle glycogen are very high. To make the most of that, I take a lot of simple carbs right away. A few hours later I'll eat again, but take carbs with a more moderate GI, as the enzyme activity is starting to wane.

    Someone who is training a lot needs to eat plenty of carbs to keep their muscle glycogen restocked. For losing weight, I'd be far more concerned about fat calories in the diet and try to reduce that instead of carbs.

    The major problem with eating a lot of sweet, sugary stuff is that it is frequently missing important vitamins and minerals. When it comes to vitamins and minerals, a can of soda is a total disaster.

    As for giving up beer to save on carbohydrates, I consider that an unacceptable trade off. The Germans refer to beer as "liquid bread". So, I give up a slice of bread per day and have a beer instead. For those who don't like beer, giving it up is a moot point.

    In the long run, I believe that the body will tell you what to eat, and imposing too many artificial restrictions may over-ride a healthy instinct.

     


    Dr. Bill Misner #1

    Recommendations For Ultra Running (CHO Intake) Pre, During & After Exercise
    (total grams complex-carbohydrates required/day)

     

    lbs 2 hrs Training 4 hrs Training 6hrs Training
    110
    300
    500
    700
    132
    400
    600
    800
    154
    500
    700
    900
    176
    600
    800
    1000
    198
    700
    900
    1100
    220
    800
    1000
    1200
    242
    900
    1100
    1300
    264
    1000
    1200
    1400

    PRE-EXERCISE
    Take 100-150 grams of complex carbohydrate glucose polymers 3 hours prior to exercise. Do not use simple sugars, fructose, honey, prior to or during exercise. If you must use simple sugars, use them after exercise.

    DURING EXERCISE
    Take 70-90 grams glucose polymer complex carbohydrate in fluid solution every hour during exercise. An energy drink may be sipped 4 times per hour for constant replenishment energy substrate flow. This should be practiced in training-to-duplicate race conditions in order to establish what individual biochemistry tolerates best. Studies show that 100 grams or above of energy drink ingested may result in gastric stress. Costill's studies using 3.5 ounces water every 5 minutes or 35 ounces per 50 minutes also encouraged Dr. Colgan's studies to conclude the need for 35 ounces fluid intake per hour. Dr. Tim Noakes, who has done recent and more extensive hydration research with marathon and ultramarathon runners, suggests that most runners should take no more than 16 ounces fluids per hour during endurance events. His findings among athletes with hyponatremia indicated they were the victims of water intoxication(too much to drink-->evidenced by excess intakes above 1000 ml. or over 30 ounces fluid per hour)

    POST EXERCISE
    Take up to 225 grams complex carbohydrates within 30 minutes optimal window time frame, include 30-50 grams easily digestible protein. Any more than 225 grams dietary carbohydrate intake may synthesize excess carbohydrates to body fat stores. Use of simple sugars may stimulate Insulin Growth Factor(IGF) for cellular uptake of post-exercise growth hormone...Which is, by the way-->good...as long as you do not take too much simple sugar. A tablespoon of fiber-rich raisins is ample to spark the IGF-factor mechanism from a post-exercise meal without introducing too much sugar into the bloodstream all at once.

    The "Grazing" technique 4-6 small meals throughout the day rather than 1-2 meals at the end of the day has been shown to maximally elevate muscle glycogen stores with minimal to no increasing of adipose tissue sites. Fluid recommendations are 35 ounces(1 quart) per hour for rehydration.

    This "simplified version" for adapting carbohydrate intake for the energy cycle has been time-tested at the Colgan Institutes with both endurance athletes and strength athletes. Provision for fuel-adaption to your specific biochemistry in the crucible of endurance exercise ideally should be tested in training runs before racing in competitive events.

    What has been outlined above is definitively not "written in stone" and may be modified to creatively and efficiently to move your specific being through the time and space of what is otherwise known as "Ultra"...


    Dr. Bill Misner #2

    Adenosine Triphosphate(ATP) is the fuel source from which the complex mechanism of long-term movement(ultrarunning) is generated by mitochondrial cells located within muscle fibers. The rate of ATP synthesis from carbohydrates is 1.0 mol/minute, while fats produce 0.5 mol/minute. Carbohydrates generate TWICE the rate of energy as fats converted to ATP! During anerobic activities, such as sprinting, energy expenditures of stored glycogen or body fats may jump up to as high as 2.4 mol/minute. At an aerobic pace, most of us use 10-12 calories of stored energy per minute. During an ultra run at the same aerobic pace pre-mentioned, consumption of carbohydrate-sourced calories from aid stations, crew, or whatever we can carry, will never meet the demand of expenditure, unless we stop running.

    The problem is the liver can only replenish calorie expenditures at the rate of 4 calories per minute. This means that a deficit of 6-8 calories per minute during an ultra or endurance workout is created regardless of the type of carbohydrates we ingest. In the initial hour of an event the average caloric profile of spent calories is 65% glycogen(carbohydrates) to 35% fatty acids for ATP conversion. Then, as we continue, an interesting internal metabolic event occurs. As this increasing deficit(6-8 calories/minute) is depleted on mostly glycogen stores, somewhere around 90 minutes after initiating exercise, the profile of caloric selection reverses to 35% carbohydrates against 65% fatty acids converted! Up to a point, the more the athlete stresses this mechanism of energy expenditure during prolonged training bouts, the more efficient it will behave when future repeated sessions are demanded.

    Karl King is correct in advising us to avoid simple sugars during an exercise event. Simple sugars characteristically have a high glycemic index, which tends to alert an insulin response from the beta cells of isles of langerhorns in the pancreas gland, sweeping blood sugars into cells as a survival response. Unfortunately when this "Sugar Crash" happens, we feel "low", shaky, and despondent. High Glycemic Index(GI)substrates also empty from gastric areas very slowly when compared to carbohydrates with a low GI. Low glycemic indexed long-chain complex carbohydrates empty the gastric area faster and with less insulin response resulting in a somewhat faster uptake for conversion within depleted tissue sites. The enzyme, Glycogen Synthase, is highest after one has spent glycogen stores. When this enzyme increases in blood serum volume, glycogen synthesis occurs at a rapid rate.The application for the endurance athlete is to utilize the optimal30-minute window after exercise by ingesting the carbs in order to replenish the glycogen without storing fat.

    How much Carbohydrate and what kind? Complex carbohydrates, Glucose Polymers, especially amylopectins, are more near like the chemical structure of human glycogen than their distant simple sugar relatives, and may lend somewhat of an advantage to glycogen conversion by the liver. Ivy(1988 J APPL PHYSIOL) demonstrated that the maximum rate of carbohydrate synthesis occurs by ingesting 225 grams of glucose polymers within a 4-hour window post exercise. Above 225 grams the advantages do not occur and the body may begin to store excess carbs in adipose tissue sites. Colgan(1990) recommends from 600-900 grams carbohydrate replenishment for intense athletic workouts, which figures out to be 2.0-3.0 grams carbohydrate per 2 hours workout per pound of body weight.

    All dietary fat(9 calories/gram) ingested takes only 3% of it to process it in to the fat storage areas, while 27% of all complex carbohydrates(4 calories/gram) are burned during the resynthesis-replenishment process. Several of the Costill late 1970 studies demonstrated dramatically the arguments supporting high carbohydrate intake during endurance training. The same scientist(Yudkin 1953) who caused us all to rethink our position on dietary fat as its harms to health and longevity also published an equal warning-concernas to the immediate danger of dietary simple sugars and their intake correlation rate with the advent of coronary heart disease(CHD) in the 20th century. This distinguished scientist's warning on dietary fat was heeded, but few of us are aware of his precautionary note regarding use of simple sugars. Coronary heart disease(CHD) was unheard of 85 years ago. As Americans began to increase their intake of sugar, the death rate(CHD) per 100,000 people increased to 60 from a person ingesting up to 20 pounds of dietary sugar per year. The average American today consumes over 120 lbs. sugar per year, raising our mortality rates(from coronary artery disease) to 300 per 100,000 deaths, or 5 times the former CHD death rate! For the damage to health that appears to occur from ingesting simple sugars, it may be best to choose complex carbohydrates and leave the sugars(Sucrose, corn syrup solids, glucose, and fructose) to small dose intake. The 7-calorie alcohol carbohydrate gram, if taken post-exercise behaves much like the simple sugar model, but in addition, it also suppresses the post-workout growth-hormone response entirely, and thus enters into the "Poor Choice" category.

    The "Sugar Buster" dietary protocol(suggested in the original post by Chip Marz) may also not supply or support an Ultrarunner's classic carbohydrate-caloric energy demand, however, it may serve as a plausible method for losing body fat stores. My experience with ultra endurance athletes is that weight-loss diets for diets that produce body-fat-burning-efficiency training are incompatible. If you have read this far, it is my wish that you found some useful dietary application that may effect your training choices into personal bests.


    Karl King #4

    Adding some thoughts to the subject of Dr. Bill Misner's post...

    One thing I enjoy ( when there's time ) is cooking. Most enjoyable for me are Chinese and Nepalese styles. One common thread in these styles is the general lack of simple sugars. Chinese cooking regards sugar not as a major ingredient, but something to be used in small amounts as a "harmonizing" ingredient.

    The sportsdrink(s) I use are based primarily on maltodextrins and contain simple sugars in small amounts, only as an agent to harmonize with the flavor. Accordingly, I never use any drink with fructose during or after an event.

    The only time I purposely take a drink with fructose or high fructose corn sweeteners is soon after rising from bed. During the night, the body uses liver glycogen as a significant energy supply. One of the quickest ways to recharge liver glycogen is to take 100-200 carbohydrate calories, primarily from fructose, upon rising. Starting an ultra with low liver glycogen is asking for trouble, so I'll get some quick calories right after rising. Then I get dressed and prepared for the run.

    I'll eat on the way to the race site. Some of my best runs have come after eating fatty foods along with a cup of coffee. That protocol raises levels of plasma free fatty acids. The concept is that if fat levels are high from the start of the run, muscle glycogen is spared early on.

    The observation that alcohol blunts the body's growth hormone response is interesting. While I enjoy a beer or a glass of red wine, I prefer to have such drinks with or just after dinner. Beer right after a run will sometimes give me a headache.

     


    Unknown #1

    The optimum dietary device for distance running is the employment of complex carbohydrates. When many simple sugars are join together forming longer chain lengths of each the result is a "Complex Carbohydrate". An example of longer chain-length complex carbohydrates are "Glucose Polymers", which are described on the ingredient lists of the better energy drinks, energy gels, and energy bars as "Maltodextrin". When ingested, complex carbohydrates do not throw the endocrine system into a wild "tizzy" like their simple-sugared short-chain cousins do. Complex carbs taste do not taste as sweet as simple sugars. Corporate manufacturers sweeten energy products for taste and for resale. When a simple sugar(sucrose or corn syrup solid) enters the human digestive system, blood sugar levels peak dramatically above baseline within 20-25 minutes, but then "crashes" below fasting baseline within the hour! Fructose, also a simple fruit sugar found in corn syrup, honey and fruit, is diverted from the stomach to the liver. Fructose raises blood sugar levels meagerly peaking at 25 minutes after eating, but also "crashes" below baseline around 70-75 minutes post. Fructose ingestion also has been shown to raise blood serum triglycerides. Liver glycogen stores are replenished from fructose intake.If possible, the ultrarunner who is concerned with optimal performance and health may want to avoid excessive intake of simple sugars both during the run and at mealtime. Every year I field dozens of questions regarding problems experienced during an ultra, from athletes who accepted a sugared energy drink-bar-gel "hand-out" from an aid station, or whose dietary practices include too much simple sugar.

    Observing a 53-year old man clad in a robe-like garment and tire-tread sandals literally "destroy" a talented field of some of the best ultrarunners in the USA over a tough 100-mile trail course stirs my curiosity vehemently to ask," How did he do that?" Does what one eats support endurance performance? The dietary choices this Tarahumara legend practices may have had some influence upon his incredible performance. The antithesis is, had he "fasted" food and water before this 100-mile ultramarathon, he may have remarkably hindered his performance results.

    Since the textbooks that describe cellular and molecular synthesis and resynthesis have generally stated that 98% of what we are today(in terms of bone, muscle, and fat cell tissues) was constructed from the foods that we ate over the past 6-month time period. Two distinguished researcher, Dr. David Costill's late 70's works and Dr. Tim Noakes' mid 80's to mid 90's research well-established the importance of complex carbohydrates and fluid replacement before, during, and after endurance exercise.

    In 1978, W.E.Connor examined the dietary practices of 523 Tarahumara Indians over a 3-year period(American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 31:1131, 1978). The Tarahumara were found to possess extremely low blood cholesterol levels(136mg/dl average for men vs. 117 mg/dl for women). Amercians tend to be above 200 mg/dl for both men and women! Connors conclusions were that these values occurred because of their extremely low dietary cholesterol intake of 71mg average per day compared to our +625mg/day in the USA. Their dietary fat intake accounted for 11% of their total caloric residue compared to between 34-40% in North American diets. Saturated fat intake was found to be 2% of the Tarahumara daily diet, while 15% is typical in the United States. Simple sugars accounted for 5% of the Tarahumara diet, while we in the States consume a whopping 25% of our diet in processed sugars. Vegetable sources provided 96% of their dietary protein, averaging 79-96 grams protein per day, more then meeting the RDA for protein synthesis(+236%-1221%). Corn and Beans are the staples which these people utilize to synthesize complex carbohydrates to muscle glycogen stores, low lipid concentrations for membranes or cell wall structures, and dietary protein for lean muscle mass resynthesis. The Tarahumaras' high physical activities, such as "kickball" games that last 1-2 days and may cover nearly 200 miles, could not be performed unless they had a cardiovascular foundation from repetitive high endurance training, low body mass indecies, a superlative cardiovascular system, and a superb supportive dietary protocol. Their dietary practices are a model for the ultrarunning community, exemplary of the importance of a high intake of fiber-rich complex carbohydrate diet, moderate vegetarian protein, and little to no saturated fat and cholesterol from meats or animal byproducts.

    The use of ergogenic glucose polymer-based drinks(maltodextrins)during an ultra event is supported by myriads of research studies dating back to the late 1970's. What's so special about maltodextrins? Maltodextrins are simply processed long-chain corn sugars with a glycemic index of below 20. The Tarahumaras simply leave the "husks" on their glucose polymers, e.g. "corn or beans". Their culture and performance in ultras favor the use of complex carbohydrates before and during extreme energy expenditure.

    Where we seem to differ is...that these people do not have the opportunity to eat from packages pumped full of additives for extended shelf life, or, at places that serve rich meats, hydrogenated fats, and simple sugars mixed in caramel-flavored-carbonated water. Most of their pre-energy substrates are from raw/cooked vegetarian foods, rich in fiber, low in salt, and almost nil in bad fats.

    The obvious differences between the Tarahumaras and American ultrarunners is that they are healthier, and, looking at the finish results...They define the art of ultrarunning.

     


    Matt Mahoney

    Dr. Bill wrote:

     

    "When ingested, complex carbohydrates do not throw the endocrine system into a wild "tizzy" like their simple-sugared short-chain cousins do."

     

    That is true at rest but not during exercise. When you are running, simple sugar is burned faster than it is absorbed, so there is no overproduction of insulin and no overshoot as blood sugar level returns to normal. The rate of absorbsion of sugar by the digestive system is 200 calories/hour. The rate of usage is 100 calories/hour at rest and 500-1000 calories/hour during exercise. When you are running, it doesn't matter what form your carbohydrates come from.

     


    Gerry Wales

    I find that the best thing for me is both. By the time I get to the aid station, I need a quick sugar high and then the more complex for in between stations. I will take candy or cookies at the aid stations and then follow that up with a GU type product and, if the aid stations have them, a bit of fruit. I remember when I got stomach upset last year at BAUS what I threw up was the watermellon I had been eating. Figure that one out.

     


    Unknown #2

    Optimal solution osmolality(mOsm.) for rapid fuel gastric-emptying must be between 280-303 mOsm., which is the same osmolality as body fluids. Dextrose reaches the body fluid osmolality level at 4-5% solution.(4 parts dextrose to 96 parts water, by weight) Sucrose-glucose reaches body fluid osmolality at 8% solution.(8 parts sucrose to 92 parts water by weight) Glucose Polymers are said to be at body fluid levels for immediate absorption at 20% solution.(20 parts Glucose polymers to 80 parts water by weight)

    Twice the quantity of Glucose Polymer carbohydrate calories pass through gastric channels as do those calories originating from fructose, sucrose, or glucose.

    The Iso-Osmotic solutions of calories provided by a solute mixture at 280-300 mOsm(body fluid equivalent) are as follows:

    Glucose..........0.2 calories/ml...5% solution
    Fructose.........0.2 calories/ml...5% solution
    Sucrose..........0.4 calories/ml...8% solution
    Glucose Polymer..1.2 calories/ml..20% solution
     

    If the energy solutes exceed body fluid osmolality, gastric emptying is absolutely halted until the body draws from it's internal fluid and electrolyte stores enough of each for lowering osmolality of the sucrose, fructose, or dextrose solutions to body fluid levels(for eventual gastric emptying). This is why an athlete should drink fluids that have been formulated to osmolality equivalences of 280-300 mOsm.(This is especially true during thermic conditions, if dehydration/electrolyte imbalances are also symptomatically in question, sudden intake of a sugar-fructose-dextrose energy drink may cause complete cessation of exercise.

    After gastric emptying is accomplished, then the liver must reprocess glucose polymers, some of the simple sugars, or starches(Tarahumara) back into tissue sites for replenishment of muscle glycogen stores. As I stated in a previous post, the liver can produce a gram per minute no matter what form of carbohydrate emptying from the gastric area. While we run selectively at chosen 70-90% VO2 Max pace, slow-twitch fibers burn the highest percentage of stored muscle glycogen, at perhaps 3-4 grams per minute. Running, therefore, creates an energy deficit of 2-3 grams per minute minimal, even when gastric emptying is optimal, using an abundant income of the optimal 20% caloric solution of Glucose Polymers. Simply put, more than twice as many calories from glucose polymers are able to pass through the stomach to the liver in the same time frame than those from simple sugar derivatives.

    B.J.M Jones(1983, GUT 24:1152-1160, and in 1987, CLINICAL SCIENCE 72:409-414.) showed that glucose polymers empty faster than glucose type sugar solutions. The question then becomes whether to run an ultra with a minimal 2-3 gram/minute deficit using glucose polymers...or, eat the "sugars" for higher deficits from their slow gastric-emptying rate, enjoy the sweets, resulting in the inevitable, a premature "bonk".

    Once gastric channels have slowly released ingested simple sugar into an ultrarunners blood stream, what other mechanisms may systemically contribute to a DNF?

     


     

     

     

    FATS:

    Remember if your very fit you use muscle and body fat more effectively for energy, use muscle carbohydrate more efficiently at normal endurance running pace. Store more carbohydrate and fat in your muscles when rested before an event even begins. Transport a larger amount of fat and glucose from the blood into the muscle when running.

    So the bottom line is train hard for a long time to make your body use fat effectively and conserve carbohydrate (That's one reason why good runners are thin, they use fat very effectively as a energy source not just in their muscles alone but their liver as well). Know what your potential is and pace intelligently from the start of an event. Eat correctly from the start of an event. That would be, drink enough water to maintain hydration. Ingest large amounts (like 100-125 grams an hour if possible) of some form of glucose. A small amount of fat and protein should be beneficial between 3 or 4 hours up to about 12 hours. Then as the event become longer in time, about 12 hours, a much larger increase of fats and proteins should be uses along with the high carbohydrate usage. Vitamin and mineral usage should mirror fat and protein usage. The increase in fat and protein use becomes increasingly very important if the total time of the event gets to be really long over about 16 hours, running into multi day events. The replacement of the body's structure mirrors the time frame of fat and protein needs in importance. This replacement of structure as well as energy replacement needs to be addressed very early in long events, for optimal efforts in long events. Deciding pacing effort in long events, the resultant balance and ratios of fuel substrates used, the replenishment of these fuel substrates and replacement of body structure through eating, is no small task. Hopefully this is of some help in that task

    One reason the run walk pacing strategy works well, is the slowing of pace allows carbohydrate recovery to happen. When you alter your stride your using a different muscle firing pattern and working at a lessened effort. This enables you to use some less fatigued and fatigued muscle in a low effort way. Because your still walking and not sitting you still have good circulation of the muscles. This helps bring blood and fuel to the muscles. Carbohydrate recovery in muscles can be very fast from muscles with very low carbohydrate levels, bringing up the level to just low muscle levels, this recovery of muscle carbohydrate can be especially fast if you have ingested a large amount of carbohydrate, this raises your blood sugar level up. Allowing the quickest possible muscle carbohydrate recovery. Low blood sugar levels equals slow recovery time, high blood sugar levels equals faster recovery time.



    Some Favorite Race Foods & Beverages

    Foods:
    Potatoes with salt, Pretzels, Chicken broth, Glucose, Relode, Powerbars, Cookies, Salty Crackers, Bananas, Rice Krispy Treats, Fig Newtons, Saltines, Turkey or Chicken or Peanut and Butter Sandwiches, Chicken Noodle or other Soups, Pancakes, Vanilla Cookies, Metabolol, GU, Dinosaurs and X-Men fruit snacks, Metabolol II, Brownies, Omlettes, Bagels, Raisins, Leppin, Tiger Bars, BTU Stoker Bars, Chewy Chocolate Chip Granola Bars, Orange Slices, Muesli bars, Cliff bars, Gorp (dry roasted peanuts, M&Ms, raisins, granola), Rice Pudding, Shredded Chicken, Potato Chips, M&M's, Cottage Cheese, Cheese, Pudding, Watermelon...

    Beverages:
    Ice water, Superfood, Rocket Juice, Fruit Juices with Electrolytes added, Gatorade (powder & pre mix), Succeed Ultra drink, Sodas (Coke, Mountian Dew), diluted Cytomax, Ultra Fuel, Hydra Fuel, Amazake Rice Drink, Exceed, half ultra fuel/ half water, Gatorade mixed with Snapple [Mango Madness], Isotonic Drinks, Endura, defizzed (flat) soda, tea, Powerade, Energy surge, Suceed ammino, Beer, MangoPlex & Gatorade, Carboplex mixed with fruit juice, Ensure, Chicken noodle soup broth, Knudsen's Recharge (organic), home-made smoothie w/apple-rasberry juice, banana, & ground walnuts & sesame seeds in it, Darjeeling tea, Cytomax w/banana blended into it, body cooler...

    (Karl Kings Notes: Endurance exercise stimulates the desire for fat. Thus, almost everybody's favorite post-run foods are fatty ones. Most include substantial protein as well.)



    Powerbars Tip:

    Love original PowerBars, but I've felt as if I were risking a broken tooth or two by eating them on cold days. This year, I came up with a solution. I cut a bar into bite-sized pieces using a sharp knife on a cutting board. Then, I put the pieces into a plastic bag with a small amount (a teaspoon or so) of powdered sugar. I shake up the bag until all sides of each piece are covered with a layer of sugar. That keeps the pieces from gluing themselves back together. Zip-lock bags seem to work pretty well in terms of being manageable with thin gloves on.    Or use Splenda/SweetnLow for calorie free sweetness/Anti stickyness

    HOME Nutrition Fitness SoBe Sites  Creve VIDEOS Contact/FeedBack