|
by Chris Shugart
Log on to the Testosterone
Forum and start reading all the threads about health. What
you'll find is that one name keeps popping up in the
conversations, and the very mention of that name is sure
to cause a heated debate. The name? Dr. Mercola.
But who is this guy and what can we learn from
him? We headed to his website (one of the most popular health
sites on the net with two million visitors per month) and what
we found was that Dr. Mercola's advice on many topics seemed to
echo much of what was written about here at T-mag.
However, the more we read, the more disturbing
some of the info became. Don't eat tuna and rice? Don't drink
milk? Eat four pounds of raw vegetables a day? Tap your face
with your finger for optimal psychological health? What the
heck!?
We could have written Dr. Mercola off, but the
truth is we kinda' like people whose ideas stir things up and
create a lot of debate. And besides, much of what Dr. Mercola
writes about — the importance of fish oils, avoiding soy protein
etc. — jibe with what we generally believe. Maybe we should look
deeper into his other ideas (even though some of them are
initially wacky sounding), talk to the guy, and let T-mag
readers decide?
Well, that's just what we did.
What's your medical
background, doc?
I'm trained in both traditional and natural medicine. I've been
a practicing physician since the early 1980s, and practicing
natural medicine actively since 1990. I'm an osteopathic
physician, or "DO." DOs, along with MDs, are licensed to
prescribe medication and perform standard surgery, but DOs bring
something extra to the practice of medicine.
Osteopathic physicians practice a "whole
person" approach to medicine, treating the entire person rather
than just the symptoms. With a focus on preventive health care,
DOs help patients develop attitudes and lifestyles that don't
just fight illness, but help prevent it, too. I'm also
board-certified in family medicine. My practice, The Optimal
Wellness Center, is based in a suburb of Chicago and is focused
on creating entire health programs for patients based around
individualized eating plans.
For T-mag readers who
aren't familiar with your work, what's your main goal?
It's
my vision to transform the existing medical paradigm from one
addicted to pharmaceuticals, surgeries, and other methods that
only conceal or remove specific symptoms (with morbid results to
our health and economy) to one focused on treating and
preventing the underlying causes.
My primary mechanism for facilitating this
transformation is through the Internet. Unlike TV, radio,
newspapers, and the other vehicles of communication, the
Internet is still not owned by the government or corporate
bodies who, for their commercial gain, inevitably control what
facts can and can't be stated. My
website
provides the public with comprehensive, clear and researched
guidance on the best nutrition, medical, emotional therapy and
lifestyle choices to improve and maintain total health.
The information on the site and in the
newsletter isn't tainted by advertisers, investors, sponsors, or
any other party offering financial or other returns in exchange
for the promotion of their ideas, suggestions or goods. When I
recommend or offer products and services on my site, it's
because I've researched them and truly believe they're the most
worthwhile; any profits I generate through the site are only
used to maintain and expand the site.
You say that the existing
medical establishment — along with the media and greedy
corporations — is responsible for killing and permanently
injuring millions of Americans. What do you mean exactly?
Those
aren't my words, but those of Dr. Starfield, who's a full
professor at Johns Hopkins, the most prestigious health care
institution in the US. This was also not published in the
National Enquirer but in the most widely circulated medical
journal in the world, JAMA, in July of 2000.
Her findings were that doctors are the third
leading cause of death in the country, killing over 250,000
people every year. I've also had private correspondence with her
and we both agree that physicians are likely the
number one cause of death in the US
when you factor in their arrogant ignorance of basic
foundational omissions that could radically improve people's
health.
Believe me, we butt heads with
doctors a lot ourselves here at T-mag. Your focus is
mainly on diet, so let's start there. Give us the Cliff's Notes
version of your dietary recommendations.
That's
easy. Let's start with water. The average American is drinking
over 600 cans of soda per year, or basically fifty-six gallons
of sugar water. The ideal solution would be to limit all your
fluids to pure, clean water. Filtered tap water is fine, but
most municipal water shouldn't be consumed without filtering.
The average American is also consuming 170
pounds of sugar per year. That is one of the single most
devastating contributors to health and aging. Additionally,
they're consuming well in excess of 200 pounds of grains and
cereal per year, 95% of them refined. Nearly all American
breakfasts are a recipe for disaster! For most of us, grains and
sugars, even unrefined, rapidly convert to sugar and further
exacerbate insulin dysfunction that accelerate nearly all
chronic illnesses.
What is the primary goal of
your recommendations? Weight loss? Life extension?
The
goal is total health. When you have a flashlight and shine it in
a dark corner, you remove the darkness. You can't have light and
darkness at the same time. Similarly, you can't have health and
disease at the same time.
My recommendations are designed to prevent
disease, optimize energy levels, extend lifespan, get people to
their ideal weight, and, for those with any form of illness or
disease, optimize the healing power that God gifted each of our
bodies with so they can truly address their health problem at
the deepest and most foundational level.
You write about high insulin
levels and the problems this causes, so do you generally
recommend a low carb diet?
Most
people benefit from no sugar and dramatically reduced grain
diets. However, everyone is different and the newer version of
my program acknowledges this through something called "Metabolic
Typing". This is a series of subjective questions by which the
answers reveal how many grains one may tolerate. Slow oxidizers
and individuals who have a sympathetically dominant autonomic
nervous system tend to require some grains in their diet to
optimize their health.
All the macronutrient recommendations depend on
one's metabolic type and their specific individual needs. There
are general starting points for each type, but ultimately one
needs to fine tune based on individual factors, such as exercise
load, stress, seasons, and circadian rhythms. If a person is not
at his optimal weight, experiences food cravings, and has a lack
of energy, then it's highly likely his current choice of foods
is less than optimal.
We hear a lot about how eating
a low-calorie diet year round can extend the lifespan. Do you go
for that?
I
really believe the central issue for most people is a drastic
reduction of most grains. Replacing the grains with vegetable
carbs will drastically reduce your insulin response. It's likely
the low insulin levels are what's responsible for the observed
dramatic increase in longevity in animal studies when they're
placed on low calorie diets.
So the key is low insulin levels. We measure
fasting insulin levels on all our patients. The lower the
better. A fasting insulin level over ten is a major problem.
Average levels are about four to six, but I like to see them
below two. In my experience it's very difficult to have your
insulin level that low without exercise.
We agree about a lot of things
— multiple small meals, omega 3's, limiting sugar intake,
avoiding soy protein etc. — but let's focus on the things that
may shock the average Testosterone reader. I'll just name
a few things and you give us your opinion and explanation. First
let's talk about grains.
I
advocate vastly reducing or eliminating the intake of grains for
almost everyone. Far more than the fat in the foods we eat, it's
the excess carbohydrates from our starch and sugar-loaded diet
that's making people fat and unhealthy, and leading to epidemic
levels of a host of diseases such as cancer and diabetes.
It was only with the advent of agriculture a
mere 10,000 years ago, or 500 generations ago, that humans began
ingesting large amounts of sugar and starch in the form of
grains (and potatoes) into their diets. Indeed, 99.99% of our
genes were formed before the advent of agriculture; in
biological terms, our bodies are still those of
hunter-gatherers.
Societies where the transition from a primarily
meat/vegetation diet to one high in cereals show a reduced
lifespan and stature, increases in infant mortality and
infectious disease, and higher nutritional deficiencies. We
haven't suddenly evolved mechanisms to incorporate the high
carbohydrates from starch and sugar-rich foods into our diet.
Okay, we agree on that, but
carbs are a necessary part of ones diet, right? From a
bodybuilding perspective, you just don't grow much muscle
without carbs.
We
all need a certain amount of carbohydrates, of course, but
through our addiction to grains (which includes corn), potatoes,
sweets and other starchy and sugary foods, we're consuming far
too many. The body's storage capacity for carbohydrates is quite
limited though, so here's what happens to all the excess:
they're converted, via insulin, into fat and stored in the
adipose, or fatty tissue.
Insulin, stimulated by the excess
carbohydrates, is responsible for all those bulging stomachs and
fat rolls in thighs and chins. Even worse, high insulin levels
suppress two other important hormones — glucagons and growth
hormones — that are responsible for burning fat and sugar and
promoting muscle development, respectively. So insulin from
excess carbohydrates promotes fat, and then wards off the body's
ability to lose that fat.
Excess grains and sugars also suppress the
immune system, contribute to allergies, and are responsible for
a host of digestive disorders. They contribute to depression and
their excess consumption is, in fact, associated with many of
the chronic diseases in our nation, such as cancer and diabetes.
Now, you say sugar is bad, but
is anything really "all bad"? For example, simple sugars after a
workout can be very beneficial.
Nearly all simple sugars are devoid of the fiber and accessory
nutrients that one needs to digest them. There's absolutely no
question from a physiological perspective one would be better to
avoid them. If you're using them for calories you can be certain
that your body needs those accessory nutrients, vitamins and
minerals just as badly as it needs the calories, and if you
neglect their intake, over time you'll develop deficiency
syndromes.
However, life is a matter of balance. If you're
healthy, it's perfectly reasonable to go off my program 5% of
the time and still have extraordinary high levels of health and
fitness. If one were to consume sugar immediately before, during
or immediately after workouts, that would probably be the
absolute best time to consume them as they'll be rapidly
converted by the body and utilized as fuel, rather than
triggering a deleterious insulin response.
Hmmm, I think we could argue
about post-training nutrition and properly timed insulin spikes,
but let's get to some of your other ideas. You talked a little
about water intake already, but give us your exact guidelines
because I know from reading your site that you're very specific
about it.
The
rule of thumb is, for every 50 pounds of body weight you carry,
drink one quart of bottled spring or filtered water per day. A
200 pound person should drink a full gallon per day. Athletes
should drink even more than that.
The spring water (not "drinking" water) should
be bottled in clear polyethylene or glass containers, not the
one-gallon plastic (PVC) containers that transfer far too many
chemicals into the water. Filtered water can be obtained through
low-cost filters, such as those provided by Culligan or PUR
brands.
Tap water should be avoided because it contains
chlorine and may contain fluoride, both toxic substances that,
with ongoing consumption, can have dire consequences for the
body. Although somewhat controversial, I also strongly recommend
avoiding distilled water because it has the wrong ionization,
pH, polarization and oxidation potentials, and can drain your
body of necessary minerals. It's also been tied to hair loss,
which is often associated with certain mineral deficiencies.
Finally, drink water at room temperature if
possible, as ice-cold water can harm the delicate lining of your
stomach and impair your body's ability to optimize nutrient
absorption.
What are your thoughts on
eating meat?
Most
adults require 50 to 120 grams of protein per day depending on
gender, body weight, and activity level — bodybuilders can
certainly require more. You should increase your intake of meat
or eggs if you need to increase your protein intake, and I
recommend protein with every meal.
As for the ideal type of meat to eat, I highly
advocate grass-fed beef — that is, not the common beef raised on
the artificial diets of grain such as corn. I also recommend
buffalo, venison, and lamb, as these are game animals less
likely to be contaminated with pesticides. Chicken, duck and
turkey are also fine sources of protein.
Any meats we should avoid?
Pork. Pigs are scavenger animals and are frequently contaminated
with parasites that aren't removed with cooking. Pork can be
heavily contaminated with mold spores in its fat. Pork is also
used in labs to culture cancer cells as it increases their
growth. I also caution against processed, cured, smoked, or
dried meats, as the nitrates that are typically added have been
shown to cause problems for most people.
I know you have some rather
odd recommendations concerning eggs. Tell us about those.
Eggs
are probably one of the best values in protein and a bodybuilder
could easily eat a dozen a day as long as he didn't heat the
yolk. This may surprise many people as they'll be concerned
about the risk of salmonella, but the reality is that salmonella
is a relatively uncommon infection in healthy, cage-free,
organically fed chickens.
Why exactly do you suggest we
not cook the yolks?
The
reason I advise not cooking the yolk is the incredible
destruction of highly perishable nutrients that occurs once the
yolk is heated. Just imagine that virtually all that's required
to grow a mammalian life form is present in the egg in the
perfect combinations. Once you heat the yolk above 105 degrees,
just like your own body, you will rapidly damage the sensitive
architecture of life, including most of the enzymes and fragile
biochemicals that facilitate health.
Imagine a delicate crystal vase. Now imagine
someone smashes it with a hammer and then tries to convince you
that it's the exact same vase as before they destroyed it
because, hey, all the pieces are still there! Well, obviously
it's not the same. It not only looks different, but it can't
perform the important function of holding fluids or displaying
the beauty it had prior to being smashed with the hammer.
Well, an unheated egg yolk may seem similar to
a cooked egg yolk, but it's far more complex and precise. We
just don't appreciate that as we can't see it at the molecular
level. If we could, the picture would be just as clear as with
the vase.
One of the major dangers of heating the yolk is
that you can damage the cholesterol in the egg and oxidize it,
especially if you mix it with egg whites, so scrambled eggs or
omelets containing the yolks are one of the worst ways to
prepare eggs. If yolks must be cooked, it's best to hard or
soft-boil them.
It may take some getting used to eating raw egg
yolks, but if one starts slowly it's not much of a problem. I
also advise adding them to the leftover pulp one creates when
vegetable juicing. If you add a little oil, the mixture turns to
a mayonnaise type substance that actually tastes quite good.
Okay, so we should eat our egg
yolks raw, but you're not advocating that we eat the whites raw,
too, are you?
It's
important not to eat your egg whites raw because egg whites have
a substance called avidin that will bind to biotin (a B
vitamin) and can cause deficiencies over time. You can put the
whites in a skillet with some water and put a lid on it and cook
them over a very low heat so all the whites are solid white and
not burnt.
Eggs are high in protein, which is good, but if
people only eat one organic food, it should be eggs. Organic
eggs contain a 1:1 omega-6 to omega-3 ratio, while commercial
eggs contain a 19:1 omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. Commercial eggs
are not unhealthy due to the cholesterol, but due to their
excessive omega-6 fats.
Most people can eat one to two dozen eggs per
week if cooked properly, as they won't cause your cholesterol to
increase with appropriate preparation. However, it's important
not to eat eggs daily or an allergy to them can be
developed. If the eggs are prepared conventionally, eat them no
more than five days per week.
I've never been a fan of milk
myself, but you're adamantly opposed to it. Why?
Commercial dairy is loaded with hormones and pesticides that
aren't doing anything to further your health. However, even if
you use organic milk, the central issue is the pasteurization
and homogenization that's performed to the milk. This processing
tends to damage the proteins in the milk and can cause
autoimmune problems over time.
Pasteurization has clearly reduced the risk of
TB and brucellosis from milk, but if you consume milk from
healthy animals to begin with, this infection risk is quite low.
Most people will benefit from at least reducing
their intake of dairy. Avoid dairy for a few weeks to see how
your health improves. If you're off all milk products, you
should consider supplementing your diet with calcium. Milk is
also an important source of vitamin D for many, so if you stop
milk, make sure you're getting enough vitamin D from other
sources.
Many people seem to tolerate raw milk and raw
milk products quite well. The problem is that in nearly every
state it's illegal to purchase raw milk, but if one finds a
cooperative farmer, barter exchanges can be arranged.
Okay, let's talk fruit.
Don't eat more than three servings of fruit per day (less if you
haven't cut back your sugar intake in other areas). Fruits like
apples, plums and strawberries are good, but I recommend
avoiding bananas because of their concentrated sugar levels.
(There's 300% more potassium in dark green vegetables such as
kale than there is in bananas.) Consuming fruit before bed is
best, as it helps increase the amount of tryptophan crossing the
blood brain barrier that will increase serotonin levels and
improve any depressive tendencies.
Avoid dried fruits, especially raisins. Fruit
juices should also be avoided. They contain a large amount of
refined carbohydrates. Each glass of juice, even those with no
sugar added, has more sugar than a glass of soda. Although it's
natural sugar, fructose, it will still negatively affect your
immune system.
We already know you're big on
vegetables, so lay the details on us please.
I
recommend replacing the grains in your diet with vegetables.
Most people also benefit far more from increasing their intake
of vegetables than supplementing with vitamins. For every fifty
pounds of body weight, you should eat a pound of vegetables per
day. This will optimize your body's pH acid/alkaline balance.
Ideally, at least one-third of all the foods in
your diet should be consumed raw because there are valuable and
sensitive micronutrients that are damaged when you heat foods.
Regularly juicing your vegetables will easily help you reach
this goal of one-third raw food in your diet.
Some vegetables are superior to others. A
general rule of thumb: green is good. The greener the vegetable,
the more healthy chlorophyll is present. Most lettuces, such as
romaine, red and green leaf, are healthy choices, but iceberg
lettuce has almost no nutritional value. Some other good
vegetables choices include spinach, celery, cucumbers, green and
red cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, asparagus, zucchini,
Brussels sprouts, onions, and red peppers. Carrots are high in
sugar and generally should be limited.
Organic vegetables are, of course, recommended,
because they not only decrease your exposure to dangerous
pesticides, but they have two to five times more nutrients as
compared to non-organic vegetables. Most people agree that they
also taste much better.
This one is really going to
hurt bodybuilders, but you're against eating tuna, right?
This
is a no-brainer. Tuna, plus most all salmon and swordfish, needs
to be avoided. Says who? Says the National Academy of Sciences.
We've been using coal to generate electricity
for over half of our country for many years. Most coal is loaded
with mercury and when it's burned it pollutes the atmosphere and
rains back into the waterways of the world and eventually even
gets to both polar ice caps. So the reality is, nearly all fish
are polluted with not only mercury, but PCBs, dioxins and many
other chemicals that'll disrupt your immune system. I do find
this sad, because without these poisons, fish would be a
wonderfully healthy food, high in the omega-3 that Americans
aren't getting enough of.
One of the few supplements I absolutely
recommend — if it can be considered a supplement — is fish oil,
because it does provide the necessary omega-3 with EPA and DHA
fatty acids. More specifically, I recommend cod liver oil in the
cold weather months, as it's high in the vitamin D necessary in
cold weather, and fish oil in warm months, when the sunshine is
producing enough vitamin D on its own. There are vastly
different quality fish oils out there, with different levels of
purity. I've researched these fish oils and we'll be offering
what I've found to be a premium brand on Mercola.com in late
October, 2002.
What you say about tuna makes
sense, but I gotta tell you, I've never known a guy to actually
get poisoned by eating too much tuna.
Never known anyone with a disease of the central nervous system
then, such as Alzheimer's? Mercury poisoning is an insidious
disease that gradually degenerates your central nervous system.
If your ability to actively excrete it is high you might get
away without obvious damage, but we do have a literal epidemic
of Alzheimer's. The number of people with that devastating
problem is expected to triple in the next generation. MS and ALS
are other neurodegenerative illnesses that have been associated
to mercury exposure.
I've seen many hundreds of people severely
damaged with this neurotoxin. It's not pretty. Tuna — and most
other fish — are polluted with mercury and a host of other
toxins, which is why I recommend avoiding it.
T-mag readers are
mostly after a muscular look. They want to be big and strong. To
be honest, some of your recommendations may help with longevity
and health, but can a person build muscle with these ideas? Can
he perform well athletically?
My
primary focus as a physician hasn't been on exercise, and when I
have it's been admittedly biased. I was one of the first 100,000
runners in the US in 1968, long before it was trendy, but I only
started weight training a few years ago, as I always felt
cardiovascular health was far more important. Now I use the
Superslow method developed by Ken Hutchinson and have a personal
trainer who helps me incorporate that into my lifestyle.
Back to your question, though. I have
some national-class bodybuilders who seem to thrive on my
program. I'm currently not networked very well into the
bodybuilding community, as my focus has been on treating
chronically sick patients, but I do understand that more and
more bodybuilders and other athletes are discussing and
incorporating some or all of my recommendations.
You recommend getting out in
the sun for at least an hour a day. Why?
Because that's what we're designed for! Of course, one needs to
exercise common sense and avoid ever getting burnt.
So why go in the sun? The obvious answer is to
get your vitamin D, which, in fact, isn't a vitamin. It's the
only "vitamin" that a breast-feeding mom needs to give in the
winter as the child doesn't get it from the mom. That should be
a giant clue that tells everyone we need sun to receive our
vitamin D.
There are literally only a handful of
clinicians who routinely measure vitamin D levels. We do it on
all patients in our office and find that well over 95% are
deficient, and most horribly deficient in the late winter and
early spring. This is typically in people who consciously avoid,
or whose work schedule has them avoid, the sun. This is
particularly true for most African-Americans and darkly
pigmented people.
Additionally, the National Institutes of Health
have very clearly identified the need for regular full spectrum
light exposure (sunlight being the best, of course) for
optimizing mental health. SAD (Seasonal Affective Disorder) is
common for many in the dark winter months and is largely related
to lack of adequate sun exposure.
Speaking of mental health, you
promote EFT, which is the "face tapping" I referred to in the
introduction of this article. What is EFT exactly?
The
Emotional Freedom Technique is the psychological technique I
routinely use in my practice and most highly recommend to
optimize emotional health. It's easy to learn, easy to use, and
highly effective.
Although it's still often overlooked, emotional
health is absolutely essential to physical health and healing.
No matter how devoted you are to the proper diet or lifestyle,
your body won't achieve its peak capabilities if emotional
barriers stand in the way.
EFT is a form of "psychological acupressure"
based on the same energy meridians used in traditional
acupuncture to treat physical and emotional ailments for over
five thousand years, but without the invasiveness of needles.
Instead, simple tapping with the fingertips is used to input
kinetic energy onto specific meridians on the head and chest
while you think about your specific problem and voice positive
affirmations.
This combination of tapping the energy
meridians and voicing positive affirmation works to clear the
"short-circuit" (the emotional block) from your body's bioenergy
system, thus restoring your mind and body's balance, which is
essential for optimal health and the healing of physical
disease.
I'll bet you get a lot
skeptics in this area.
Some
people are initially wary of these principles that EFT is based
on — the electromagnetic energy that flows through the body and
regulates our health is only recently becoming recognized in the
West. Others are initially taken aback by the EFT tapping and
affirmation methodology — it may not seem "manly," and, in fact,
can be downright amusing to witness for the first time. But,
more than any other technique I've used or researched, it works.
If Testosterone readers are interested,
I offer a free
EFT manual for anyone who wants to read more and learn this
technique.
Now, you're a marathon runner.
T-mag readers are mostly bodybuilders, powerlifters and
combat athletes. How do your dietary guidelines change when
dealing with that population. Or do they?
I
used to be a marathoner. I now only run enough to stay healthy
which has been about 18 miles a week for the last ten years. I'm
actually at this time more of a weight trainer.
Clearly, bodybuilders or anyone using their
muscles regularly will increase their protein requirements. You
can't build muscles without protein and amino acids. Depending
on one's program, they can take very high levels of protein.
However, one should strive for the ideal levels. It makes
no sense to take too much protein, which will increase the risk
for kidney damage. But virtually all of my other guidelines are
identical for bodybuilders as the rest of the population.
I find your ideas fascinating,
but I have to be honest, some of your recommendations seems to
go a little overboard. Here are some examples:
You say: women should not wear underwire bras because the
metal is bad for them, don't use microwaves, don't stay up after
10 PM, don't use an electric razor, don't get a root canal,
don't drink water with meals, don't use fluoride in your
toothpaste, don't get your kids vaccinated, don't swim in
chlorinated pools, don't chew gum and don't carry your car door
remote in your pocket.
Honestly, this stuff may help me live longer, but I'd die
anyway from stressing out over it all!
These are fine-tuning recommendations that can be ignored if one
chooses when they're healthy. Please remember, I'm managing many
thousands of patients with chronic illnesses who've been to the
best-of-the-best traditional medical doctors but got no positive
change from them. Many times these seemingly crazy
recommendations I make — recommendations based on facts provided
through reputable sources, by the way, not "magic" or guesswork
— do indeed result in dramatically positive results for these
patients.
Most, but not all, of the recommendations you
just listed damage only in small ways on an individual basis,
and a reasonably healthy person has enough reserve to compensate
for that damage to some extent. But the damage of all these
things is cumulative, and over time will lead to many different
types of degenerative illness.
Just as in other areas of life, if you follow
some of the advice, you'll be better off than following none of
it. It's most wise, of course, to focus on the basic advice,
which includes eating an optimized diet and addressing your
emotional wounds and barriers with an effective tool like EFT.
Nearly all of us have some internal bioelectrical
short-circuiting from previous negative life events that's
limiting us from experiencing the fullness that life has to
offer.
Okay, fair enough. But I'd
like to play the "bad cop" just once more. You've been called
paranoid and your ideas have been called "health paranoia
personified." Many have also called for studies that back up
some of the stranger claims. How do you respond to your critics?
Actually, this is the first I've heard of that particular label.
But people can say what they want to say. I'm not offended in
the least, and certainly not surprised. I'm typically ten to
twenty years ahead of the pack in many areas. When I first
started running in 1968, people were literally throwing rocks
and cans at me as they thought I was some sort of nut. You'd
never see anyone running in the street in the 60s; now there are
millions of people running.
I could go on and on with dozens of other
examples, but the real question is this, what's my real
motivation? And what's the real motivation of those criticizing
me and other natural physicians?
Those who criticize natural physicians like me
tend to come from the traditional medical establishment, meaning
they are the medical practitioners, hospitals and research
groups purchased by pharmaceutical companies and other
giant healthcare corporations and therefore addicted to
prescribing drugs, surgery and other band-aids to patch up
versus end or avoid diseases. If they're consumers joining in on
the criticizing, they tend to be heavily influenced by TV and
other mass media, whose messages are, of course, largely
purchased by the traditional medical establishment.
The existing medical establishment's primary
trick is to get consumers to forget the most important question
— their real motivation — by dazzling you with what appears to
be magnificently trustworthy qualifications. But their "clinical
studies" conducted by heavily biased "researchers," their
advertisements and news stories carefully scripted to scare you
into belief, their highly polished corporate offices and
corporate websites, and their extreme focus on whatever has the
most profit potential versus health potential, aren't
qualifications at all! They aren't "factual." They're scams
designed to feed greed.
So, criticisms from the
medical establishment aren't much of a surprise to you?
Obviously, when a natural physician comes along with the aim of
telling the truth to enable people to live longer and rely far
less on patchwork healthcare, they'll try to stick all sorts of
negative labels on me. I'm a threat to their profit, so they
call me "paranoid" or a "quack" or whatever they think will
instantly appeal to the easily misled, the blind followers, in
our society.
Meanwhile, it doesn't take a lot of deep
thought to realize that my program, at its heart, is based
entirely on common sense: an ideal diet and lifestyle, the
things you do and do not put into your body everyday, and the
way you treat and maintain your body and mind are far more
important to your health and well-being than choosing between,
say, pain relievers. How often though do you see commercials
promoting romaine lettuce or vegetables in general, versus those
promoting Tylenol, Motrin and all the other pain relievers? Who,
in other words, has really cornered the market on paranoia?
So, then, what's my motivation? My motivation —
which is truly my passion — is to find the absolute best
strategies that address the foundational causes of disease so
people's health is restored and optimized for a longer and more
fulfilling life. In my experience with the nearly 20,000
patients I've seen, and secondarily, in my years of discussions
with other medical practitioners and my ongoing research of
traditional and alternative medical studies, I've learned an
extensive amount about all the particulars I recommend.
The vast majority of those patients who were
consistently compliant with my recommendations improved their
health. With the people I saw earlier on in my practice, the
percentage was much lower, but now my success rate is well over
90%. The people who trust me with guiding them back to health
are the only ones I'm responsible to. That's why I seek to
provide them with the best of the best. As for those who simply
parrot the tainted criticisms of the traditional medical
establishment, well, it's their loss, not mine.
Thanks for the interview, Dr.
Mercola. I'm sure it'll stir up a few more heated debates!
For more information, visit
www.mercola.com
or
The Optimal Wellness Center. Also, in early spring of 2003,
Putnam will be publishing Dr. Mercola's first mass-market book,
The No-Grain Diet.
|